Teams

WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 NEL Neenah McGrath

2024 WI Mixed 18 & Over · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesJonathan Paque / Lori Hein vs Theresa Palasota / Zachary Brandt6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJoan Matlock / Frederick Graichen vs Karthick Muthaiyan / Kathy Kelly4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMaureen McGrath / Amitesh Sharma vs Chelsea Watry / Brandon Jonen2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesPIYUSH ATRE / Lori Hein vs Kyle Oberstadt / Katie Oberstadt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusie Loker / Anthony Nooren vs Karthick Muthaiyan / Natalie Brandt6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSteve Hale / Samantha Sloan vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Brandon Jonen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesSue van Vreede / Chin-Yi Lin vs Katie Oberstadt / Kyle Oberstadt0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaureen McGrath / Anthony Nooren vs Theresa Palasota / Judson Beck6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmitesh Sharma / Samantha Sloan vs Kathy Kelly / Karthick Muthaiyan3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAnthony Nooren / Joan Matlock vs Natalie Brandt / Zachary Brandt5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJonathan Paque / Lori Hein vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Brandon Jonen6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFrederick Graichen / Samantha Sloan vs Erica Shookman / Chris Gezella5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJonathan Paque / Sue van Vreede vs Kyle Oberstadt / Katie Oberstadt4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMaureen McGrath / Chin-Yi Lin vs Theresa Palasota / Zachary Brandt5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmitesh Sharma / SOUMYA GITEY vs Erica Shookman / Chris Gezella7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesPIYUSH ATRE / SOUMYA GITEY vs Natalie Brandt / Zachary Brandt4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Nooren / Sue van Vreede vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Brandon Jonen6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Hein / Steve Hale vs Kathy Kelly / Karthick Muthaiyan6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesPIYUSH ATRE / Lori Hein vs Kyle Oberstadt / Katie Oberstadt6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJonathan Paque / Sue van Vreede vs Theresa Palasota / Zachary Brandt6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFrederick Graichen / Susie Loker vs Chelsea Watry / Karthick Muthaiyan1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesPIYUSH ATRE / Sue van Vreede vs Chelsea Watry / Zachary Brandt3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Paque / Lori Hein vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Brandon Jonen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmitesh Sharma / Samantha Sloan vs Judson Beck / Kathy Kelly3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 NEL Appleton N HS Jonen6215924223
2WI Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 NEL Neenah McGrath2691534234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Nooren
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Steve Hale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Chin-Yi Lin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Sue van Vreede
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Jonathan Paque
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Scott Springmier
published
Amitesh Sharma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Joan Matlock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Frederick Graichen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Hein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
PIYUSH ATRE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
SOUMYA GITEY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Samantha Sloan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susie Loker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Paque + Lori Hein6159% gamesnot enough data
Lori Hein + Steve Hale6074% gamesnot enough data
Lori Hein + Scott Springmier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anthony Nooren
45W–20L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Hale
44W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3.5
Chin-Yi Lin
22W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Sue van Vreede
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.90
Jonathan Paque
21W–45L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Scott Springmier
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Amitesh Sharma
15W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joan Matlock
25W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
2.59
Frederick Graichen
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Hein
23W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
PIYUSH ATRE
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
SOUMYA GITEY
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Samantha Sloan
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susie Loker
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.