Teams

GNO YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-04vs VC ORANGELost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Heichel vs Chrissy Musgrove4-6, 0-6
2024-08-28vs HW NAVYWon 10
W#1 SinglesStacie Cowell vs Tia Carroll7-5, 6-2
2024-08-27vs GCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren Turra / Stacie Cowell vs Judith Pearson / Sarah Schnittman1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTonya Fallows / Brie Westphal vs Ilana Larson / Marissa Sproles2-6, 0-6
2024-08-14vs GAC YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Heichel / Leigh Shubin vs Jennifer Accola / Heather Volkman0-6, 0-6
2024-08-07vs HFII BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Heichel / Julie Moreau vs Kelly Peecher / Kathy Hoover4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStacie Cowell vs Georgeann Doyna2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-07-31vs EM BLACKWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarni Warren / Tonya Fallows vs Jenny Willits / Dana Pluss Parks0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Heichel vs Kristi Lamar6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMeredith Johnson / Stacie Cowell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-24vs CHCC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacie Cowell / Lisa Heichel vs Julie Isaac / Kathy Michel6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Meredith Johnson
published
2.34
Stacie Cowell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.31
Julie Moreau
published
2.23
Lisa Heichel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.23
Marni Warren
published
2.17
Lauren Turra
published
2.07
Brie Westphal
published 2.5
2.04
Tonya Fallows
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.65
Leigh Shubin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Heichel + Tonya Fallows72042% games+2.1% vs expected
Lauren Turra + Meredith Johnson2345% games−1.5% vs expected
Tonya Fallows + Marni Warren134 matchesnot enough data
Marni Warren + Brie Westphal134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Moreau + Tonya Fallows213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Heichel + Brie Westphal213 matchesnot enough data
Brie Westphal + Leigh Shubin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Johnson
10W–15L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Stacie Cowell
57W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.34
Julie Moreau
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Lisa Heichel
38W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
Marni Warren
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.23
Lauren Turra
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Brie Westphal
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Tonya Fallows
25W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Leigh Shubin
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.