Teams

Holder/40/4.0/NO/CP

2026 NO Adult 40 & Over - Men · 4.0 NO (40&O) Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-08vs Jaynes/40/4.0/NO/MCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Wolf / Pat Neely vs Scott Levy / Michael Seaman6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMatthew Bolton vs Ashley Abbott0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLarry Holder / Mike Connolle vs Marc Jaynes / Lance McCardle4-6, 5-7
2026-03-30vs Walker/40/4.0/NO/CPWon 40
W#1 DoublesPat Neely / Scott Martina vs Scott Walker / Mike Lecler6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJavier Jacome vs Steve Strain6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNick Dobson / Greg Dadlez vs John Lindsey / Phuong Nguyen6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLarry Holder / Sid Trouard vs Eric Sanders / Erich Weishaupt6-2, 6-4
2026-03-18vs Jaynes/40/4.0/NO/MCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPat Neely / Scott Martina vs Lance McCardle / Michael Seaman7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJavier Jacome / Nick Dobson vs Mark Broussard / David Myers6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Bolton / Thomas Wolf vs Brian Rotolo / Chuck Viator6-3, 6-4
2026-02-25vs Walker/40/4.0/NO/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesPat Neely / Matthew Bolton vs Mike Bradford / Christopher Taylor6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSid Trouard / Scott Martina vs Scott Walker / Danny Russo6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichael Madere / Greg Dadlez vs Phuong Nguyen / Eric Sanders6-2, 6-2
2026-02-09vs Jaynes/40/4.0/NO/MCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesLouis Roth / Scott Martina vs Ashley Abbott / Lance McCardle6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSid Trouard / Nick Dobson vs Brian Rotolo / Chuck Viator5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Wolf / Greg Dadlez vs Marc Jaynes / Mark Broussard6-3, 6-4
2026-02-04vs Walker/40/4.0/NO/CPWon 40
W#1 DoublesPat Neely / Scott Martina vs James Graham / Mike Lecler6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLouis Roth vs Steve Strain6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJavier Jacome / Nick Dobson vs Eric Sanders / Christopher Taylor7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMike Connolle / Sid Trouard vs Jason Bonnet / Jourdan Generes6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 NO (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Holder/40/4.0/NO/CP602138130
2Jaynes/40/4.0/NO/MCC24101433251
3Walker/40/4.0/NO/CP1551941262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Thomas Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Javier Jacome
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.90
Matthew Bolton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Pat Neely
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Scott Martina
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.81
Larry Holder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Louis Roth
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Greg Dadlez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.71
Nick Dobson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Sid Trouard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Michael Madere
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matthew Jackson
published
Mike Connolle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Whitsell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Holder + Thomas Wolf5162% games+14.2% vs expected
Scott Martina + Thomas Wolf5252% games−5.1% vs expected
Mike Whitsell + Mike Connolle134 matchesnot enough data
Scott Martina + Larry Holder303 matchesnot enough data
Scott Martina + Mike Whitsell303 matchesnot enough data
Scott Martina + Javier Jacome303 matchesnot enough data
Scott Martina + Pat Neely303 matchesnot enough data
Scott Martina + Greg Dadlez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Wolf
39W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.93
Javier Jacome
37W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Matthew Bolton
47W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
Pat Neely
61W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
Scott Martina
53W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Larry Holder
30W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Louis Roth
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
3.5
Greg Dadlez
24W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.76
Nick Dobson
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Sid Trouard
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Michael Madere
38W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
Matthew Jackson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Connolle
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Whitsell
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.