Teams

Laurel Oak Better Late Than Never

2022 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-31vs Sarasota - Plantation/HortonLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeri Sayre / Julie Sparma vs Patricia Dipierro / Beth Costa3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHaven Beach / Marci Plattner vs Janet Kramer / Eileen Hendrick4-6, 1-6
2022-05-24vs LBK Public AllenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Sparma / Teri Sayre vs Arden Allen / Holly Parker6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHaven Beach vs Kimberley Pelyk6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarci Plattner / Susan Scarlett vs Molly Gleason / Helen Turner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-10vs LBK Club LidskyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Sparma / Teri Sayre vs Karin Buffett / Lisa Tyson6-4, 7-6
2022-05-03vs LWN SherrWon 10
W#1 SinglesHaven Beach vs Susan Gillis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-26vs SSC FeinbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Sparma / Teri Sayre vs Joy Voke / Lynsea Arnold1-6, 3-6
2022-04-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesHaven Beach vs Tie Mccullough6-7, 2-6
2022-04-12vs GT Bray RacquettesLost 02
L#1 SinglesHaven Beach vs Celia Pena3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Sparma / Teri Sayre vs Mary Hennessy / Sandra Cook6-7, 5-7
2022-04-05Won 10
W#1 SinglesHaven Beach vs Monica Darold6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Cindi Gomez
published 4
3.75
Liz Taft
published
3.57
Julie Sparma
published
3.44
Teri Sayre
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Susan Scarlett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Amy Christensen
published 3.5
Haven Beach
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Leslie Jones
published
3.21
Shelley Heller
published
2.98
Roberta Bake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Sayre + Susan Scarlett3546% gamesnot enough data
Teri Sayre + Haven Beach2537% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindi Gomez
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Liz Taft
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Julie Sparma
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
Teri Sayre
42W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
4
Susan Scarlett
30W–68L career · 1 line in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Amy Christensen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Haven Beach
26W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Jones
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Shelley Heller
47W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Roberta Bake
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.