Teams

Refunded

2026 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · Hold

14 players · average NTRP 3.79 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Hold have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Paula Fernandez-Pita
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
3.82
Cameron Hodgson
published 4
3.76
Erin McAllister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
3.37
Matthew Durbin
published
3.33
Zana Piric
published 3.5
3.28
Natalie Naramor
published 3.5
3.18
3.01
Dr Amy Linder
published
2.85
Sarah Kingery
published
2.77
Molly Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Asa Burnham
published 3
Jerri Lemanski
published
Kathleen Cannon
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Paula Fernandez-Pita
147W–59L career · type D · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.61
4
Cameron Hodgson
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Erin McAllister
26W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Pradeep Hariharan
197W–108L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Matthew Durbin
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Natalie Naramor
180W–87L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Jacqueline Wolborsky
66W–45L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Dr Amy Linder
14W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Sarah Kingery
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Molly Walker
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
2.77
3
Asa Burnham
15W–42L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Jerri Lemanski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Cannon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.