Teams

RRC Set 2 Win 55+ 7.0W

2026 55&Over Women · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-04vs WTC The Hot Shots 55+ 7.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Susan Williamson vs Susan Oh / Laura Leva6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Trapp / Kristen Hoft vs Joanne Teoh / Maria Tardio7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLillian Schulz / Wendy Hyer vs Melissa Colavito / Cynthia Borcherding6-2, 6-0
2026-08-03vs Hampshire CC Net Vets 55+ 7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Karen Moriarty vs Robin Frankel / Eileen Troise0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Hoft / Laura Frase vs Maria-Elena Fernandez-Beros / Yvonne Iversen7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Elizabeth Johnson vs Polly Teitel / Sylvia Swanson6-1, 6-4
2026-07-30vs TCH Love Me Nots 55+ 7.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Williamson / Elizabeth Johnson vs Kathleen DiSalvatore / Ellen Dumark4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Hyer / Lillian Schulz vs IZABELLA ALEXANDROWSKI / Naomi Ortiz-Honor6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Trapp / Kristen Hoft vs Karen Healy / Suzanne Page6-2, 6-2
2026-07-14vs Hampshire CC Net Vets 55+ 7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Karen Moriarty vs Jacqueline Bohan / Kathy Blenk3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Hoft / Suzanne Trapp vs Maria-Elena Fernandez-Beros / Robin Frankel7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Nask / Wendy Hyer vs Sylvia Swanson / Polly Teitel6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-30vs Sportime HI 55+ 7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Williamson / Elizabeth Johnson vs Joan Hiam / Erika Jaeger6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Karen Moriarty vs Denise Regan / Aileen Calnan-Burke2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Young Kim vs Myrna Gardner / Janie Frieman4-6, 4-6
2026-06-16vs NRRC Grey Goose Squad 55+ 7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Karen Moriarty vs Deborah von Glahn / Laura Buckley7-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesLillian Schulz / Wendy Hyer vs Ingrid Mudge / Andrea Fage6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElaine Hartstein / Kristen Hoft vs Ann Katzenstein / Helen Chun4-6, 0-6
2026-05-19vs WTC The Hot Shots 55+ 7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Kristen Hoft vs Patricia Meyers / Yumiko Tanaka7-6, 1-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Young Kim vs Diane Falconer / Melissa Colavito3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Frase / Wendy Hyer vs Laura Leva / Karen Grund7-6, 6-3
2026-05-12vs Matchpoint Players 55 7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Hoft / Karen Moriarty vs Angela Jansen / April Solomon0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Trapp / Susan Williamson vs Karen Connell / Patches Magarro6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Nask / Elaine Hartstein vs Laurette Klein / Cara Bristol4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Wendy Hyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.46
Janice Cavatoni
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Helene Ginsburg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kristen Hoft
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.13
Nefertiti Greene
published
3.12
Elizabeth Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Susan Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Andrea Mancini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Karen Moriarty
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.00
Laura Frase
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.93
Lillian Schulz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.84
Susan Nask
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.27
Dolores Principe Masino
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Elaine Hartstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Trapp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Young Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Frase + Kristen Hoft7356% games+13.4% vs expected
Wendy Hyer + Lillian Schulz5065% games+10.9% vs expected
Laura Frase + Karen Moriarty7255% games+7.9% vs expected
Karen Moriarty + Susan Nask2547% games+6.6% vs expected
Laura Frase + Lillian Schulz15555% games+3.8% vs expected
Andrea Mancini + Karen Moriarty3351% games+3.6% vs expected
Susan Williamson + Elizabeth Johnson391455% games+3.3% vs expected
Janice Cavatoni + Kristen Hoft171453% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Wendy Hyer
196W–154L career · 8 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.48
Janice Cavatoni
227W–104L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Helene Ginsburg
82W–74L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Kristen Hoft
109W–78L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
Nefertiti Greene
30W–49L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Elizabeth Johnson
52W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.12
Susan Williamson
63W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Andrea Mancini
155W–124L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Karen Moriarty
181W–179L career · 7 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Laura Frase
140W–117L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Lillian Schulz
122W–89L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Susan Nask
92W–91L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Dolores Principe Masino
146W–140L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Elaine Hartstein
52W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Trapp
13W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Young Kim
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.