Teams

Ponwith/LR/PVCC

2025 Mixed 18 & Over 3.0, 4.0, 10.0 · 10.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-23vs Crawford/LR/RebWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Eibes / Tatum Rice vs Trent Brandon / Melissa Wild7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-23vs Crawford/LR/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesTatum Rice / Parker Stearns vs Ashley Murdock / Trent Brandon6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJesse Ponwith / Austynn Crocker vs Carolina Quevedo Aranda / Andrew Conover0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRebecca Bailey / Bishop Bass vs Paula Juels Jones / Cole Guy6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-26vs Crawford/LR/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesBishop Bass / Austynn Crocker vs Ashley Murdock / Casey Garretson6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLindsey Ponwith / Scott Eibes vs Austin Crawford / Melissa Wild1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBecky Sherman / Jesse Ponwith vs Andrew Conover / Carolina Quevedo Aranda2-6, 3-6
2025-06-18vs Crawford/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsey Ponwith / Daniel Cornelison vs Cole Guy / Melissa Wild6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTatum Rice / Parker Stearns vs Paula Juels Jones / Casey Garretson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBecky Sherman / Aaron Hudson vs Ashley Murdock / Trent Brandon2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 10.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bishop Bass
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Daniel Cornelison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.50
Jesse Ponwith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Austynn Crocker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.32
Becky Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Parker Stearns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lindsey Ponwith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Eibes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tatum Rice
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Parker Stearns + Austynn Crocker404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bishop Bass
5W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Daniel Cornelison
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jesse Ponwith
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Austynn Crocker
12W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Becky Sherman
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Parker Stearns
11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Lindsey Ponwith
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Eibes
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tatum Rice
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.