Teams

Woodlake Schneeberger

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Weekday Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-18vs HCC GerczakWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Irene Shepherd vs Debra Suyama / Renee Fisher7-5, 6-2
2023-07-13vs SCC Nickel / DielWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Lim Han vs Debby Gies / Christie Cory6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Schneeberger / Irene Shepherd vs Colleen Quattlebaum / Aimee Collins6-2, 6-3
2023-07-07vs TDC WoodWon 10
W#1 SinglesIrene Shepherd vs Kerry Whitacre6-1, 6-2
2023-07-06vs ACAC HarrisonWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Jeanean Phelps vs Susan Winckler / Teresa McClellan6-2, 6-2
2023-06-29vs WOCC KramerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Lisa Giangregorio vs Jenny Norfleet / Meda Lane2-6, 1-6
2023-06-23vs Kings Charter RamserWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Carolyn Wieder vs Mary Thumma / Tabitha Harris6-2, 6-1
2023-06-20vs HCC LeonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Lisa Giangregorio vs Kimberly Way / Elizabeth Wiertel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Wieder / Irene Shepherd vs Rita Ryan / Blakley West6-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Irene Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Jeanean Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Lisa Giangregorio
published
2.85
Lim Han
published
2.79
Judy D'Amico
published
2.79
2.60
Laura Brawley
published
2.51
Alison Joyce
published 3
2.22
Diane Renkin
published 2.5
Meaco Coffey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanean Phelps + Irene Shepherd10558% games+8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Irene Shepherd
111W–81L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jeanean Phelps
145W–152L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Lisa Giangregorio
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
2.86
Lim Han
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.85
Judy D'Amico
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Rebecca Schneeberger
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Laura Brawley
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Alison Joyce
2W–28L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Diane Renkin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.22
Meaco Coffey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.