Teams

2-SSmith-HVCC

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day

8 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-20vs 8-KTravis-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesHadley Nixon / Kristen Ingle vs Amber Oberle / Krissy Anderson2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Muth Humphreys / Kelly Moore vs Kelly Travis / Tracey Maurer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-13vs 7-HHutchins-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Muth Humphreys / Lauren Powell vs Crissy Haley / Mignon Lunsford7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-06vs 3-AHeymann-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesHadley Nixon / Aimee Poduri vs Courtney Mills / Chris Jackson6-2, 6-2
2024-08-23vs 6-AHoots-UNCLost 02
L#1 DoublesHadley Nixon / Elizabeth Albright vs Lynn Edgar / Amy Hoots1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTiffanie Hoover / Sterling Ingui vs Patty Hubbard / LAURIE KIEFFER4-6, 2-6
2024-08-16vs 4-JRosen-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesStacey Smith / Lauren Muth Humphreys vs Stacey Lange / Marybeth Evers3-6, 3-6
2024-08-09vs 5-OStephens-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Muth Humphreys / Stacey Smith vs Dianna Erwin / Julie Liddle3-6, 2-6
2024-08-02vs 1-KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Smith / Lauren Muth Humphreys vs Kensy Ryan / Joanie Preyer6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Amy Herman
published 3.5
3.23
Hadley Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Kristen Ingle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Lauren Muth Humphreys
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Melanie Biese
published
3.06
Aimee Poduri
published 3.5
2.97
Lauren Powell
published
2.56
Sterling Ingui
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hadley Nixon + Kristen Ingle4351% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Biese + Kristen Ingle134 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Powell + Hadley Nixon123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Muth Humphreys + Hadley Nixon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Herman
22W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.60
3.5
Hadley Nixon
77W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Kristen Ingle
60W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Lauren Muth Humphreys
112W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Melanie Biese
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Aimee Poduri
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
3.06
Lauren Powell
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Sterling Ingui
43W–78L career · 6 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.