Teams

Ehle/Henke 18+ Summer 2025

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-07vs Rindt: MTC 18+ Summer LeagueLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Frascone / Susan Nixon vs Ashley Bykowski / Jennifer Kuhlmann6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-30vs MILLER - ECCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Frascone / Susan Nixon vs Laura Olson / Maria Loucks6-3, 6-3
2025-06-23vs Overdahl/Dymit Sum25Lost 23
W#1 DoublesSusan Nixon / Tiffany Anderson vs Molly Dymit / Kathy Cima6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSusan Bernstein vs Shannon Overdahl1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarcie Myers / Charlotte Hanley-Jacobson vs Shannon Ellis / Cate Dymit6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesKatie Eggert vs Ashley Pitzen7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Ehle / Jill Riley vs Min Kim / Annie Staloch3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-16vs Northern/Wolson/18&Over3.5WLost 23
W#1 DoublesTiffany Anderson / Susan Nixon vs Julianne Braun / Jane Christensen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Wenck vs Sydney Davis6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Riley / Heidi Johnson vs Meaghan Mclaughlin / Kim Wolson5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKatie Eggert vs Christina Larson2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJill Therien / Mary Henke vs Shelly Gosz / Devina Gundberg4-6, 2-6
2025-06-09vs ICC 18+ 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Anderson / Jennifer Frascone vs Maddy Persuitti / Lauren Sundick7-5, 6-0
2025-05-12vs MILLER - ECCWon 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Anderson / Jennifer Frascone vs Stephanie Sislo / Amy Weber6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Heidi Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Tiffany Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Jennifer Frascone
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Jennifer Wenck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Renee Marek
published
3.35
Dina Wolkoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Susan Bernstein
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Kara McGuire
published
3.25
Laurie Ehle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Mary Henke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Charlotte Hanley-Jacobson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Marcie Myers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jill Riley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Katie Eggert
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Susan Bohlke
published
2.99
Jill Therien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Hannah Siegel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Wendi Kelly
published
Elizabeth Nye
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Marek + Kara McGuire19762% games+7.3% vs expected
Jennifer Wenck + Tiffany Anderson4356% games−0.2% vs expected
Mary Henke + Marcie Myers4354% games−1.4% vs expected
Charlotte Hanley-Jacobson + Marcie Myers4747% games−4.7% vs expected
Mary Henke + Susan Bohlke4350% games−5.9% vs expected
Jill Riley + Heidi Johnson314 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Ehle + Mary Henke213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Henke + Wendi Kelly213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heidi Johnson
35W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Tiffany Anderson
32W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Jennifer Frascone
101W–81L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jennifer Wenck
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Renee Marek
26W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Dina Wolkoff
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Susan Bernstein
19W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Kara McGuire
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Laurie Ehle
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Mary Henke
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Charlotte Hanley-Jacobson
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Marcie Myers
20W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jill Riley
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Katie Eggert
10W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Susan Bohlke
18W–25L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Jill Therien
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Hannah Siegel
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Wendi Kelly
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Elizabeth Nye
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.