Teams

LTA-Q RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs MEA BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKrystal Thomas / Mary Scharrer vs Lisa Vogt / Kremena Gross6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Kirtland / Tammy Duerksen vs Christine Belin / Karen Brungard2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmelia Curtis / Sarah Silver vs Kelly McGahan / Tina Aweida6-1, 6-1
2026-07-06vs NJ GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesErika Cistone / Brooke Graham vs Jennifer Davis / Laura Garrido2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmy Kirtland vs Tanya Hartney2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Karch / Tammy Duerksen vs Kellyn Goeken / Shannon Hempelman0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Silver / Amelia Curtis vs Abbey Wood / Susan Tomlinson3-6, 3-6
2026-06-29vs BCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesErika Cistone / Mary Scharrer vs Alison Miller / Laura Studebaker6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKrystal Thomas vs Amy Nichols4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmelia Curtis / Tammy Duerksen vs Lalenia Quinlan Aweida / Kristin Kalush6-4, 6-4
2026-06-22vs TTA BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesTammy Duerksen / Brooke Graham vs Michelle Templeton / Mindy Gasser4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Kirtland vs Jessica Marten6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Karch / Erika Cistone vs Sheila Fossen / Meredith Griffith6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmelia Curtis / Sarah Silver vs Allison Brickey / Kristen Womer6-2, 6-3
2026-06-15vs CVTA BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrooke Graham / Krystal Thomas vs Amy Conway / Chesley McColl4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Kirtland vs Silvana Hose6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmelia Curtis / Melissa Karch vs Jessica Catlin / Nancy Fishbein6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Silver / Desiree Kazarosian vs Alison Gorsevski / Karen Zacharewicz7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-08vs MEA BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesKrystal Thomas / Erika Cistone vs Judy Savage / Andrea Barsch0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Kirtland vs Cristin Hanson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTammy Duerksen / Melissa Karch vs Tina Aweida / Kelly McGahan1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Silver / Amelia Curtis vs Jenny Stroud / Miriam McCarty7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-01vs NJ GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesErika Cistone / Krystal Thomas vs Abbey Wood / Kristin Walters5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDesiree Kazarosian vs Kellyn Goeken1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Duerksen / Brooke Graham vs Sara Leaver / Laura Garrido0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Karch / Amy Kirtland vs Susan Tomlinson / Heather Young6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Mary Scharrer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Amy Kirtland
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.79
Amelia Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Erika Cistone
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Melissa Karch
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Brooke Graham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Krystal Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.53
Desiree Kazarosian
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.44
Sarah Silver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Tammy Duerksen
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Silver + Amelia Curtis2351% games+5.6% vs expected
Melissa Karch + Amy Kirtland6255% games+2.2% vs expected
Krystal Thomas + Erika Cistone2441% games−5.5% vs expected
Brooke Graham + Tammy Duerksen0528% games−16.9% vs expected
Tammy Duerksen + Erika Cistone2442% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Karch + Tammy Duerksen224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Karch + Amelia Curtis033 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Duerksen + Mary Scharrer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Scharrer
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Amy Kirtland
16W–14L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Amelia Curtis
3W–6L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Erika Cistone
78W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Melissa Karch
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Brooke Graham
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Krystal Thomas
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Desiree Kazarosian
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Sarah Silver
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
3
Tammy Duerksen
76W–63L career · 6 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.