Teams

Top Spinners

2026 USTA 55 & OVER · 7.0 Women - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-28vs Team OverheadWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Kutz / Jamie Crivello vs Stephanie Roche / Heather Carleton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnie Kepler / Alexa Carroll vs Kristina Peterson / Sallie Felton7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVicky Kmetz / Janice Mossberg vs Kelly Milligan / Suzanne Thomas0-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs Wyoming/Ruble/55AdultW7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Kutz / Jamie Crivello vs Christina Wykert / TimAnn Day3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlexa Carroll / Annie Kepler vs Ann Ruble / Stacia Vigneri4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarol McGuire / Lisa Porter vs Mary Ridgeway / Deborah Theriault2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-27vs Team OverheadLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Kutz / Lisa Porter vs Stephanie Roche / Jill Baldauf6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlexa Carroll / Vicky Kmetz vs Kelly Milligan / Heather Carleton6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnnie Kepler / Janice Mossberg vs Suzanne Thomas / Alexa Halaby6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-27vs Wyoming/Ruble/55AdultW7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Kutz / Jamie Crivello vs TimAnn Day / Christina Wykert4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlexa Carroll / Vicky Kmetz vs Mary Ridgeway / Deborah Theriault6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol McGuire / Annie Kepler vs Kim Byrd / Jodi Foss2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Ruble/55AdultW7.03184993
2Top Spinners225717118
3Team Overhead135716114

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Vicky Kmetz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Annie Kepler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Alexa Carroll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Carol McGuire
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Janice Mossberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jamie Crivello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Porter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Mossberg + Annie Kepler3547% games+5.2% vs expected
Carol McGuire + Alexa Carroll404 matchesnot enough data
Alexa Carroll + Vicky Kmetz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Vicky Kmetz
35W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Annie Kepler
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Alexa Carroll
8W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carol McGuire
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Janice Mossberg
121W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jamie Crivello
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Porter
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.