Teams

TYoung (Park Road)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-25vs SPierle (Lifetime)Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Desai / Katherine Costello vs Cindi Helms / Ashley Bowles4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMaggie O'Neill vs Emily Weigel3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMeghan Murphy / Kimberly Hoben vs Pamela Burks / Shannon Pierle6-3, 6-1
2025-04-11vs MKleber/LGrant (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Costello / Christina Desai vs Leslie Goldfarb / Stephanie Meadow6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKimberly Hoben / Mary Sherman vs Jessica Abrams / Laura Brown6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-04vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Costello / Catherine Becker vs Wendy Jourdan / Margaux Karagosian6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristina Desai / Maggie O'Neill vs Annaliese Anderson / Dana Zimmer6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-21vs LAndersen/TRichardson (Chestnut)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Hoben / Mary Sherman vs Loretta Anderson / Becky Shopf6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMaggie O'Neill vs Dana Holloman6-2, 6-3
2025-03-07vs MSchrimsher (Jeff Adams)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKatherine Costello / Lauren Thurmond vs Ellen Smith / Tiffany Hurrell6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMaggie O'Neill vs Suzy Johnson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Hoben / Mary Sherman vs Amy Langdon / Margaret Schrimsher0-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Katherine Costello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Taylor Young
published
3.92
Spencer Blythe
published
3.86
Kimberly Hoben
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Catherine Becker
published 4
3.81
Christina Desai
published 4
3.76
Lauren Roberts
published
3.76
Lauren Thurmond
published
3.67
Maggie O'Neill
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Mary Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Allison Abbott
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Sherman + Kimberly Hoben19856% games+8.7% vs expected
Katherine Costello + Lauren Thurmond123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Costello
62W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.05
Taylor Young
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.96
Spencer Blythe
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Kimberly Hoben
56W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Catherine Becker
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Christina Desai
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Lauren Roberts
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Lauren Thurmond
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Maggie O'Neill
23W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Mary Sherman
54W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Allison Abbott
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.