Teams

DP - Owen

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter

25 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-23Won 20
W#1 DoublesJim Ryan / Alicia Davis vs Jim Browning / Mairi Reynolds6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachael Owen / Victor Fishman vs Stacia Keith / Erik Bernstein6-3, 7-5
2025-03-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGregg Johnson / Alicia Davis vs Clara Fishel / Tyrus Watts2-6, 6-7
2025-03-02vs SCC HOPKINSWon 10
W#3 DoublesRachael Owen / Jim Ryan vs Richard Delaguardia / Jenni Rock6-2, 6-0
2025-03-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Rambow / Owen Christiansen vs Ridley Stallings / Chad Brooks7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-05Split 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Rambow / Owen Christiansen vs Marc Frischer / April Solomon6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlicia Davis / Gregg Johnson vs Aida Avendano / Todd Swezey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Davis / Gregg Johnson vs Heather Mihuta / Brian Mihuta6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachael Owen / Justin Owen vs Nikkie Swain / Travis Swain6-2, 6-1
2025-01-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesJustin Owen / Rachael Owen vs Randy Etheridge / Kim Beveridge6-3, 6-2
2025-01-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesJustin Owen / Rachael Owen vs Norberto Donnet / Sara Donnet6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 SATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Holly Holdsworth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Owen Christiansen
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.27
Brian Hale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Alicia Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.27
Alicia Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.24
Taylor Kloustin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.24
Taylor Kloustin
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Wanda Frost
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Kevin Eichelberger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.17
Rachael Owen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Rachael Owen
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.13
Paul Garnett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Sarah Ward
published 3
3.05
Katherine Glusica
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Ruth Devey
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.98
Jim Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Trey Iorillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Margaret Cribbs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Victor Fishman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gabriela McMullen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Gregg Johnson
published
Gregg Johnson
published
Julie Rambow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Justin Owen
published
Justin Owen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Holdsworth + Rachael Owen6071% games+21.5% vs expected
Alicia Davis + Rachael Owen4163% games+20.0% vs expected
Ruth Devey + Margaret Cribbs5454% games−4.0% vs expected
Sarah Ward + Margaret Cribbs0625% games−10.9% vs expected
Owen Christiansen + Trey Iorillo2347% gamesnot enough data
Owen Christiansen + Wanda Frost2345% gamesnot enough data
Paul Garnett + Katherine Glusica5071% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Eichelberger + Margaret Cribbs134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Holdsworth
14W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Owen Christiansen
14W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Brian Hale
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Alicia Davis
30W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
3
Alicia Davis
30W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Taylor Kloustin
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Taylor Kloustin
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Wanda Frost
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kevin Eichelberger
21W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Rachael Owen
27W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Rachael Owen
27W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Paul Garnett
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Sarah Ward
126W–138L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Katherine Glusica
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Ruth Devey
12W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jim Ryan
25W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Trey Iorillo
27W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Margaret Cribbs
24W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Victor Fishman
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Gabriela McMullen
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gregg Johnson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gregg Johnson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Rambow
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Owen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Owen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.