Teams

Guy/RR/Texarkana

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 5.0 Men - Local League at State

7 players · average NTRP 5.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-17vs Polk/Bentonville/INDWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrent Brandon / Cole Guy vs Danny Polk / Eddie Hunter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSamuel Moore vs Patrick Wildman1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJake Bridges / Sebastian Romanos-garzon vs Adam Attas / Justin Stohlton6-2, 6-4
2026-05-17vs Makris/LR/CCLRLost 12
W#1 DoublesCole Guy / Trent Brandon vs Aaron Hudson / Tiaan Steenkamp3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSebastian Romanos-garzon vs Kevin Praphan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Garretson / Ivan Michelli vs Bishop Bass / Chris Nosari1-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs Makris/LR/CCLRWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrent Brandon / Jake Bridges vs Aaron Hudson / Tiaan Steenkamp6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSebastian Romanos-garzon vs Kevin Praphan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCole Guy / Casey Garretson vs Jesse Ponwith / Grant Jones6-2, 6-4
2026-05-16vs Polk/Bentonville/INDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJake Bridges / Sebastian Romanos-garzon vs Eddie Hunter / Edmund Hui6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesIvan Michelli vs Patrick Wildman1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCole Guy / Samuel Moore vs Danny Polk / Justin Stohlton6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Men - Local League at State
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Guy/RR/Texarkana317513113
2Polk/Bentonville/IND043919113

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.72 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Cole Guy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.81
Jake Bridges
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Casey Garretson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.73
Sebastian Romanos-garzon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.40
Trent Brandon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ivan Michelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Samuel Moore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jake Bridges + Trent Brandon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cole Guy
8W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.96
Jake Bridges
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Casey Garretson
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sebastian Romanos-garzon
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.73
Trent Brandon
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.40
Ivan Michelli
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Moore
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.