← Teams

MAC-Leedy

2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Joe Conyard
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Sara Crate
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Bill Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Brooke Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Rudy Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Mark Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Dorothy Cofield
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results6 ties
2020-03-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Julie Trujillo / Warren Olsen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Bill Henderson vs Jennifer Lucas / Ben Yamaguchi6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSara Crate / Walt Crate vs Lana Lane / David Lucas7-5, 6-2
2020-03-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Jeffrey Bayless vs Danielle Cuenco / John Kin6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Bill Henderson vs Gabriela McIntosh / Alex McIntosh6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Rudy Martinez vs Joy Meyers / William Seidl7-5, 6-0
2020-02-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Rudy Martinez vs Megan Daniels / Dan Tracy6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Sharon Vipond / Michael Callahan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Walt Crate vs Shella Razon-Lumetta / Monte Roulier6-3, 6-4
2020-02-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Bill Henderson vs Ann Kitchen / Andrew Kitchen6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDeb Garris / Jeffrey Bayless vs Ellen Foley / Alex Delarosa6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Matthew Casimo vs Gail Bolte / Matt Bolte6-4, 6-4
2020-01-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMark Meyer / Kristin Eckelman vs Edmund Yuan / Sharon Chastain6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoe Conyard / Brooke Daniel vs Jane Shu / Greg Finnegan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWalt Crate / Sara Crate vs Wenyan Li / Anne Lang6-4, 6-2
2020-01-12Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Rita DeWeese / Jim DeWeese6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Mark Meyer vs Nancy Osborne / Charles Yim6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSara Crate / Walt Crate vs Julie Ahn / Gerald Chase6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Joe Conyard
52W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Sara Crate
92W–86L career
0%88%12%
3.47
4
Bill Henderson
108W–120L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Brooke Daniel
66W–48L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Mark Meyer
37W–43L career
22%78%0%
3.07
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Dorothy Cofield
82W–134L career · type A
2%97%1%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.