Teams

Team Rindfusz

2022 NMI Mx 40&O O'Connor · 2022 NMI Mx 40&O 8.0 O'Connor

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-02-27vs Team O'ConnorLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason Guthrie / Sherry Guthrie vs Mike Rubino / Leslie Cooper4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Rindfusz / Tina Blackman vs Bryan Olshove / Cathy OConnor4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBrian Phillips / Jackie Rindfusz vs Derek Brown / Margaret Fedder6-1, 6-4
2022-02-27vs Team PattenWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Rindfusz / Tina Blackman vs John Hyatt / Sandra Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDennis Green / Jackie Rindfusz vs Eric Fournier / Elizabeth Ammond6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJason Guthrie / Sherry Guthrie vs Scott Jongekrijg / Lisa Newhouse6-3, 6-3
2022-02-26vs Team O'ConnorLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Rindfusz / Tina Blackman vs Mike Rubino / Leslie Cooper2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJackie Rindfusz / Dennis Green vs Robert Walker / Rachel Stivani4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Phillips / Jana Phillips vs Cathy OConnor / Bryan Olshove2-6, 1-2
2022-02-26vs Team PattenWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Rindfusz / Tina Blackman vs Robert Boynton / Mary Pomeroy6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJackie Rindfusz / Dennis Green vs John Hyatt / Sandra Johnson7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSherry Guthrie / Jason Guthrie vs Eric Fournier / Jennifer Patten6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2022 NMI Mx 40&O 8.0 O'Connor
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team O'Connor40102492
2Team Rindfusz227510107
3Team Patten0411123147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Sherry Guthrie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Jackie Rindfusz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Brian Phillips
published
David Rindfusz
published
Dennis Green
published
Jana Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Guthrie
published
Tina Blackman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherry Guthrie
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Jackie Rindfusz
20W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Brian Phillips
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
David Rindfusz
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Dennis Green
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jana Phillips
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jason Guthrie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Blackman
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.