Teams

PTCTC - Castellow/Stoots

2025 SCTA Winter '24 · '25 - USTA Adult 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for '25 - USTA Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Yan QIU
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
3.47
Erin Stoots
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.41
Janna Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.36
Beth Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Brenda van Den Enden
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Joyce Link
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Andrea Feygin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Shannon Castellow
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Pauline Kim
usually #4 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Alicia Steele
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kimberly Mulkey
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published
3.12
Karina Morales
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published
3.11
Amanda Page
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
2.81
Kimberly Niedzwiecki
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Tracy Ross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karina Morales + Yan QIU11267% games+14.0% vs expected
Joyce Link + Kimberly Mulkey3548% games+7.0% vs expected
Shannon Castellow + Andrea Feygin6161% games+5.1% vs expected
Shannon Castellow + Brenda van Den Enden6449% games−4.2% vs expected
Andrea Feygin + Brenda van Den Enden3347% games−8.0% vs expected
Janna Campbell + Beth Ellis3450% gamesnot enough data
Joyce Link + Shannon Castellow314 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Link + Yan QIU314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yan QIU
50W–8L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Erin Stoots
31W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Janna Campbell
6W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Beth Ellis
9W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Brenda van Den Enden
28W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Joyce Link
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Feygin
30W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Shannon Castellow
20W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Pauline Kim
24W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Alicia Steele
11W–40L career · 12 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Kimberly Mulkey
28W–30L career · 10 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Karina Morales
27W–6L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3.5
Amanda Page
20W–3L career · 11 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kimberly Niedzwiecki
12W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.81
Tracy Ross
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.