Teams

Rohlinger/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-23vs Avant/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeredith Philips / Rachel Burford vs Katie McDermott / Krystal Shaw5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCaitlyn Arkwright vs Lauren Parks6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Pike / Cori Egan vs Julie Little / Anna Avant3-6, 0-6
2025-04-16vs Ogles/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Rohlinger / Caitlyn Arkwright vs Tressa Ogles / Sarah Conrad6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristina Pike vs Amber McCabe6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Brown / Cori Egan vs Emily D Folk / Mary Anne Pohlman6-1, 6-1
2025-04-08vs Avant/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Burford / Meredith Philips vs Ashley Powers / Anna Smith6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChristina Pike vs Julie Little1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSamantha Rohlinger / Cori Egan vs Summer Farmer / Lauren Parks6-1, 6-2
2025-03-19vs Montague/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Rohlinger / Nancy Chandrasekaran vs Jami Feinberg / Mary Wilkes Yonchak1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Burford vs Anna Witte1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Miklos / Melissa Brown vs Madeleine Bobango / Laura Weaver6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ashley Akil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Caitlyn Arkwright
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Christina Pike
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Nancy Chandrasekaran
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
2.60
Monica Burt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Rachel Burford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.55
Cori Egan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Meredith Philips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Lindsay Miklos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Samantha Rohlinger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Akil + Monica Burt10265% games+19.2% vs expected
Lindsay Miklos + Samantha Rohlinger2542% games−2.6% vs expected
Rachel Burford + Samantha Rohlinger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Akil
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Caitlyn Arkwright
14W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Christina Pike
3W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Chandrasekaran
11W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Monica Burt
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%25%75%
2.60
Rachel Burford
26W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
3
Cori Egan
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Meredith Philips
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Lindsay Miklos
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Samantha Rohlinger
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Christine Meisenheimer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.