Teams

Guthrie, Harper

2025 Mixed 18 & Over-JXN · 3.5 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-22vs Bailey, BenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargaret Kovar / Alexander Enos vs Beau Brady / Mandalin Blanton7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoseph Guthrie / Natalie Howell vs Joseph Hull / Jenny Claire Hammond Dyre0-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs Pace, PhillipLost 12
L#1 DoublesKyle Jones / Margaret Kovar vs Mitch Stentiford / Heather Biddle2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristian Medina / Sheila Self vs Taurean Buchanan / Christine Waldrop6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavis Roberson / Emily Henderson vs Scott Holston / Megan Tyson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-30vs Sykes, JoannaLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila Self / Jeremy Self vs Emma Pullen / Matt Carpenter2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristian Medina / Margaret Kovar vs Jackson Pullen / Sara Pullen1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlexander Enos / Emily Henderson vs Joanna Sykes / Stacey Sykes7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-23vs Adams, AmberLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Kovar / Davis Roberson vs Amber Mullin / David Adams5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristian Medina / Emily Henderson vs Emily Coleman / Paul Kimble4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Self / Jeremy Self vs Lisa Little / Jay Irving4-6
2025-06-09vs Alexander, TerraWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheila Self / Davis Roberson vs Carla Rushing / Thomas Rushing6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoseph Guthrie / Natalie Howell vs Terra Alexander / Julio Morales0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Kovar / Alexander Enos vs Jason Dyess / Kelli Payne6-1, 6-0
2025-06-02vs Smith, AutumnWon 20
W#1 DoublesSheila Self / Jeremy Self vs Autumn Smith / Christopher Shaw6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoseph Guthrie / Natalie Howell vs Hayley Hayes / Jason Hampton6-4, 6-1
2025-05-19vs Dutta, SouravLost 02
L#1 DoublesKyle Jones / Margaret Kovar vs Sourav Dutta / Laura McMahon1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristian Medina / Emily Henderson vs Christopher Mays / Lauren Davis2-6, 4-6
2025-05-12vs Ward, DarrellLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Self / Alexander Enos vs Dante Grant / Deborah McGehee5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristian Medina / Emily Henderson vs Darryl Barnes / Tempestt Gilmore1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Guthrie / Natalie Howell vs John Patton / Crystal Glenn2-6, 1-6
2025-05-05vs Byrd, AdamLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristian Medina / Mary Kate Diltz vs Jonathan Sims / Ashley Howell2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Howell / Joseph Guthrie vs Daniel Benefield / Emma Bond2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Self / Alexander Enos vs Katie Miller / Jordan Miller6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Byrd, Adam7220717194
2Ward, Darrell44101429214
3Guthrie, Harper2791839262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Jeremy Self
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Mary Kate Diltz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Margaret Kovar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.14
Christian Medina
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.07
Davis Roberson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Natalie Howell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Alexander Enos
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Joseph Guthrie
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sheila Self
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Self + Jeremy Self4255% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Guthrie + Natalie Howell1429% gamesnot enough data
Emily Henderson + Christian Medina123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Self
44W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Mary Kate Diltz
56W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Emily Henderson
5W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Kovar
24W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christian Medina
51W–50L career · 13 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Davis Roberson
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Natalie Howell
7W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.83
3
Alexander Enos
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Joseph Guthrie
8W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Self
29W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.