Teams

GSCC BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-09vs GSCC SILVERWon 31
W#1 DoublesSiri Olsen / Anne Sale vs Alexandra Braeger / Megan Hayes6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Amy Thornton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Boyd / Amy Roggie vs Heidi Paul / Erin Zalinski6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKatie Winder / Mckenzie Winder vs Kate McRaith / Emily Greener7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-08vs BASALT GOLDLost 13
W#1 DoublesMary Boyd / Sasha Enewold vs Leslie Riddel / Valerie Yaw3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMckenzie Winder vs Denise Taylor2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKsana Oglesby / Siri Olsen vs Lauren Noble / Adele Melnick6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKeely Eberly / Afton Larsen vs Corin Brucker / Karen Price3-6, 3-6
2025-06-07vs CROWN REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Stacey Adams vs Andrea Olson / Kathy Robinson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKsana Oglesby / Keely Eberly vs Crystal McNamee / Judi Simecek3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Winder / Miranda Wagler vs Kelly Capri / Julie Glen6-2, 6-2
2025-05-28vs RVR GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnne Sale / Stacey Adams vs Amy Filiss / Makenzie Eshelman7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Boyd vs Nancy Harris6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKsana Oglesby / Susie Demers vs Jill Brewer / Tricia Pionzio6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAfton Larsen / Katie Winder vs Diane Boat / Katie Karow0-6, 1-6
2025-05-12vs RVR GOLDWon 31
W#1 DoublesStacey Adams / Anne Sale vs Amy Filiss / Dianne Leoni6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Katie Karow6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSasha Enewold / Amy Roggie vs Diane Boat / Jennifer Given3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSiri Olsen / Afton Larsen vs Susan Blizzard / Makenzie Eshelman2-6, 4-6
2025-05-05vs GSCC SILVERWon 31
W#1 DoublesSiri Olsen / Stacey Adams vs Brady Emens / Erin Zalinski6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMiranda Wagler vs Heidi Paul6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmy Roggie / Sasha Enewold vs Meghan Hegberg / Kate McRaith3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusie Demers / Keely Eberly vs Emily Greener / Lily Freiborg4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Stacey Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Miranda Wagler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Siri Olsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Anne Sale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Mary Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Amy Roggie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Keely Eberly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Susie Demers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Ksana Oglesby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Afton Larsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katie Winder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mckenzie Winder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Sasha Enewold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ksana Oglesby + Siri Olsen10561% games+11.6% vs expected
Stacey Adams + Siri Olsen20077% games+8.3% vs expected
Sasha Enewold + Amy Roggie12160% games+6.1% vs expected
Amy Roggie + Mary Boyd9457% games+4.6% vs expected
Anne Sale + Siri Olsen20171% games+3.7% vs expected
Anne Sale + Stacey Adams161058% games+2.7% vs expected
Sasha Enewold + Mary Boyd4154% games+1.1% vs expected
Susie Demers + Keely Eberly3444% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Adams
62W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Miranda Wagler
84W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Siri Olsen
95W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Anne Sale
88W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Mary Boyd
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Amy Roggie
95W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Keely Eberly
41W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Susie Demers
39W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Ksana Oglesby
30W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Afton Larsen
4W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Katie Winder
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mckenzie Winder
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sasha Enewold
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.