Teams

Alisal-Rancheros

Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - SB · SB-7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-15vs COAC-TsunamisWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Haws / Walden Bohnet vs Christina Kensington / Frank Raya6-1, 6-2
2024-06-08vs Elings-RacqueteersLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Gautier / Rich Carlson vs Veronica Buck-Tomm / Ryan Chambers1-6, 3-6
2024-05-04vs COAC-TsunamisWon 10
W#2 DoublesBlair Fox / Cindy LuLu Young vs Danuta McCall / Frank Raya6-3, 6-3
2024-04-20vs SB-LLW-Hawks-KC CollinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesRich Carlson / Cindy LuLu Young vs Katherine Fabbre / Noel Skaling4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB-7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Budi Kazali
published 4
3.34
Steven Baird
published
3.29
Arie Dejong
published 3.5
3.27
Adam Haws
published 3.5
3.25
Catherine Gautier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Brianna Decker
published 3.5
3.22
Jaime Dejong
published
3.22
Walden Bohnet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Susan Lemon
published
3.04
Cindy LuLu Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Jane Nicolais
published
Claire Lee
published 3
James Chambers
published
Jennifer Rasmussen
published
Kyle Lemon
published
Melinda Johnston
published
Mike Nicolais
published
Rich Carlson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Nicolais + Jane Nicolais61147% gamesnot enough data
Jaime Dejong + Arie Dejong4643% gamesnot enough data
Walden Bohnet + Adam Haws3258% gamesnot enough data
Brianna Decker + Budi Kazali213 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Johnston + Kyle Lemon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Budi Kazali
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Steven Baird
18W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Arie Dejong
7W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Adam Haws
5W–7L career · type M · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Gautier
47W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Brianna Decker
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Jaime Dejong
26W–32L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Walden Bohnet
78W–92L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Susan Lemon
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Cindy LuLu Young
91W–101L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Jane Nicolais
18W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Claire Lee
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James Chambers
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Rasmussen
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kyle Lemon
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melinda Johnston
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Nicolais
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rich Carlson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.