Teams

All About That Ace- Kemon

2025 Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekend · Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekend 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.19 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-23vs Rally Cats 3.0- HunsickerSplit 11
L#2 SinglesElisa Joyner vs Ingrid Hunsicker4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJJ Herbert vs Linda Dinga6-0, 6-1
2025-03-09vs Rally Cats 3.0- HunsickerSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJolene Lopez vs Stephanie Settle7-5, 0-3
W#3 SinglesElisa Joyner vs Linda Dinga6-4, 4-3
2025-02-16vs Rally Cats 3.0- HunsickerWon 20
W#1 SinglesElisa Joyner vs Shannon Leigh6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJJ Herbert vs Cheryl Arnold6-0, 6-1
2025-02-01vs Rally Cats 3.0- HunsickerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTOBI PARK vs Sarah Midgley6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJolene Lopez vs Kim Hovda3-6, 2-6
2025-01-11vs Rally Cats 3.0- HunsickerLost 01
L#3 SinglesElisa Joyner vs Linda Dinga6-7, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekend 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
JJ Herbert
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Jill Vaughan
published
3.36
TOBI PARK
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Anna Allen
published 3.5
2.98
Amy Kemon
published 3
2.97
Phyllis Corley
published 3
2.87
Jolene Lopez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.83
Elisa Joyner
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.75
Lisa White
published
DeAnna Burke
published 3
2.44
Janet Bailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Vaughan + JJ Herbert6162% games+9.5% vs expected
Amy Kemon + Phyllis Corley11363% games+6.0% vs expected
Elisa Joyner + Amy Kemon5753% games+2.9% vs expected
Elisa Joyner + Phyllis Corley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
JJ Herbert
108W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Jill Vaughan
22W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
TOBI PARK
48W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Anna Allen
29W–21L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Amy Kemon
87W–51L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Phyllis Corley
139W–82L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Jolene Lopez
80W–113L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Elisa Joyner
56W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Lisa White
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
DeAnna Burke
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Bailey
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.