Teams

Perotti

2026 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-06vs ElcockWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Slatnick / Anthony Perotti vs Stan Williams / James Mullennix6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLawrence Herman / Robert Carey vs Randall Henigin / William Bell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-03vs WalshLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Carey / Thomas Jenkins vs Steven Edwards / Chris Hofer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael McNees / Douglass Lamartin vs Chris Cruzcosa / Xavier Estrada2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Abels / Richard Ruth vs David Connell / Frank Burnett6-3, 6-3
2026-07-30vs NorrisLost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard Ruth / Lawrence Herman vs Eric Rogers / Elmer Buddy Baylor6-7, 4-6
2026-06-25vs WalshLost 03
L#1 DoublesJose Toro / Michael McNees vs Richard Howard / Scott Intner3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Carey / Thomas Jenkins vs Dave Degreenia / Tom Walsh3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnthony Perotti / Douglass Lamartin vs Chris Hofer / Xavier Estrada6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-18vs ElcockLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Abels / Robert Carey vs Chris Elcock / James Mullennix4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Slatnick / Douglass Lamartin vs Stan Williams / William Bell6-4
2026-06-11vs NorrisLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Carey / Richard Ruth vs Hal Bloom / Cary Sanders2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Abels / Steven Slatnick vs Ronald Colbert / Dana Dolvin2-6, 3-6
2026-06-04vs WalshLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnthony Perotti / Robert Carey vs Russell Maxwell / Dave Degreenia2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDouglass Lamartin / Steven Slatnick vs William Ravekes / Richard Howard3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJose Toro / Thomas Jenkins vs Steven Edwards / Tom Walsh3-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs ElcockWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Ruth / Michael McNees vs Chris Elcock / Raymond Lyons6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLawrence Herman / Thomas Jenkins vs Randall Henigin / William Bell5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Abels / Anthony Perotti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-21vs NorrisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDouglass Lamartin / Michael McNees vs Ronald Colbert / Mike Spivey4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Abels / Anthony Perotti vs Hal Bloom / Jonathan Gladstone7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Norris7120410146
2Perotti2661837242
3Elcock1761839255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Richard Ruth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Richard Abels
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Jose Toro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Michael McNees
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Douglass Lamartin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.65
Anthony Perotti
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.49
Lawrence Herman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Robert Carey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roger Perry
published
Steven Slatnick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Ruth + Richard Abels9166% gamesnot enough data
Anthony Perotti + Richard Abels3545% gamesnot enough data
Richard Abels + Douglass Lamartin1533% gamesnot enough data
Lawrence Herman + Richard Ruth314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Richard Ruth
70W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Richard Abels
105W–95L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Jose Toro
30W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Michael McNees
18W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Douglass Lamartin
38W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Anthony Perotti
27W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
2.5
Lawrence Herman
21W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Robert Carey
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roger Perry
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Slatnick
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thomas Jenkins
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.