Teams

WPAFB Iden

2025 OH OV FALL A18&O Weekend · Fall 4.0 Men Dayton

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-09-28vs KTC ComptonLost 04
L#1 DoublesMatthew Chmiel / Joseph Graham vs Gary Konnert / Kyle Nagel3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDouglas Iden / Nelson Gabriel vs Brooks Compton / Jason Matthews1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChristopher Sigler vs Chris Compton4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Steck / Dibya Das vs Keith Boroczk / Jim Minard3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall 4.0 Men Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Emanuel Papp
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Alex Sarihan
published 4
3.63
Christopher Sigler
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4
3.56
Jim Liu
published
3.33
Douglas Iden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Nelson Gabriel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Dibya Das
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Josh Steck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
John Manovich
published
Matthew Chmiel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Bernhardt
published
Tony Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nelson Gabriel + Douglas Iden4846% games−0.3% vs expected
Douglas Iden + Jim Liu7650% games−2.4% vs expected
Tony Brown + Thomas Bernhardt044 matchesnot enough data
Tony Brown + Nelson Gabriel033 matchesnot enough data
Nelson Gabriel + Thomas Bernhardt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emanuel Papp
41W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Alex Sarihan
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Sigler
37W–53L career · 9 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jim Liu
26W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Douglas Iden
37W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
Nelson Gabriel
33W–69L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Dibya Das
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Steck
13W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
John Manovich
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Chmiel
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Bernhardt
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Brown
14W–34L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.