Teams

Deleted Women - Spring

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · Deleted Spring - Women

6 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Deleted Spring - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Margo Hafner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Hailey Mitchener
published
3.65
Melanie Kiker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Mindy Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Lorie Whitby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Scarlett Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Lancaster + Margo Hafner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margo Hafner
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Hailey Mitchener
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Melanie Kiker
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Mindy Lancaster
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Lorie Whitby
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Scarlett Mullins
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.