Teams

Vitamin T (40+)

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2021-08-03vs Shipley (40+)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKelly Cipolla / Shelley Swaim vs Rosemary Prola / Mary Ellen Staggers1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly LaRose / Margaret Sybert vs Kelly Murray / Mary Barall6-2, 6-3
2021-07-28vs ShotmakersLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Tow / Kelly Cipolla vs Cheryl Cook-Auerbach / Linda Shojaei0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesShelley Swaim vs Robin Thomas-Closson1-6, 6-5
L#2 DoublesDonna Jones / Kimberly LaRose vs Nika Edwards / Diane Miller4-6, 3-6
2021-07-20vs Ladies of the Net 3.5 (40+)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Cipolla / Kimberly LaRose vs Alison Punsalan / Michelle Limeres4-6, 2-6
2021-07-15vs Sets in the City (40+)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLinda McArthur / Jodie Phillips vs Christine Driscoll / Beyza Akcam6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Lee / Shelley Swaim vs Donna Slaughter / Julie Snavely0-6, 2-6
2021-07-06vs Super SmashLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Mansfield / Kimberly LaRose vs Dawn Collins / Mei Moy-Lui0-6, 1-6
2021-06-27vs MacAttack 3.5 (40+)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly LaRose / Shelley Swaim vs Debra MacDonald / Laura Haney4-6, 2-6
2021-06-21vs Casual Sets (40+)Split 11
W#2 DoublesJodie Phillips / Joanna Coffey vs Maria Cristina Sanchez / Katherine Battista6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShelley Swaim / Kelly Cipolla vs Laura Lewandowski / Helen Lee6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2021-06-15vs Rally Girls 3.5 (40+)Won 20
W#1 SinglesLinda McArthur vs Brenda Poore6-4, 3-1
W#2 DoublesShelley Swaim / Christine Lee vs Leigh Leslie / Ugur Erickson6-4, 6-2
2021-06-06vs Happy HittingLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeslie Mansfield / Jodie Phillips vs Nicole Brizan / Nancy Brown4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Cipolla / Shelley Swaim vs Tina Sarfaraz / Nicole Connell5-7, 2-6
2021-06-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMegan Kessler / Shelley Swaim vs Angie Norris / Dina Rachuba6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2021-06-02vs SparksWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda McArthur / Susan Howland vs Pamela Leffler / Debbie Drown6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelly Cipolla / Shelley Swaim vs Marge Naviasky / Lisa Martinez7-5, 6-3
2021-05-17vs Will play for Chardonnay (40+)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda McArthur / Leslie Mansfield vs Gerrie Bost / Susan Tipsord3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Howland / Jodie Phillips vs Amy Lamont / Alicia Mabry6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Cipolla / Shelley Swaim vs Elizabeth Hatton / Mihaela Pertea7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2021-05-15vs Oaksmith 3.5 (40+)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMargaret Sybert / Shelley Swaim vs Valerie Hicks / Sandy Segrist1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly LaRose / Leslie Mansfield vs Jackie Crispell / Farrah O'Colman4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Megan Kessler
published 4
3.30
Kimberly LaRose
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Leslie Mansfield
published
3.13
Jodie Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Neetu Gupta
published
3.02
Linda McArthur
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Donna Jones
published 3
2.97
Joanna Coffey
published
2.92
Kelly Cipolla
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.90
Shelley Swaim
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Cipolla + Shelley Swaim5943% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Cipolla + Kimberly LaRose2443% gamesnot enough data
Jodie Phillips + Linda McArthur224 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Swaim + Kimberly LaRose123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Megan Kessler
76W–38L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Kimberly LaRose
147W–119L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Leslie Mansfield
36W–23L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Jodie Phillips
110W–116L career · 4 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.13
Neetu Gupta
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Linda McArthur
73W–81L career · 4 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Donna Jones
21W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.97
Joanna Coffey
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Kelly Cipolla
106W–137L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3.5
Shelley Swaim
124W–168L career · type A · 11 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.