Teams

Cracked Racquets

2024 18&Over Men · 5.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-05vs Northern: AmicoLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Arciero / Noah Arciero vs Michael Amico / Masami Surisawa4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephane Legris / Matthew Vaughan vs William Brahler / Philippe Ceas6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-08-04vs Northern: AmicoLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Arciero / Noah Arciero vs Masami Surisawa / Tristan Wise6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Clay vs Dylan Davis3-6, 4-6
2024-08-01vs Northern: AmicoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNoah Arciero / Matthew Vaughan vs Arjun Ramakrishnan / Philippe Ceas5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJoan Marc Fajula vs Brian Bowman6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-28vs Northern: AmicoWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Marc Fajula / Stephane Legris vs Brian Bowman / Dylan Davis7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNicholas Grosso vs Tristan Wise6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-21vs Northern: AmicoWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicholas Grosso / William OBrien vs William Brahler / Tristan Wise6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJoan Marc Fajula vs Brian Bowman6-2, 6-4
2024-07-14vs Northern: AmicoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWilliam OBrien / Nicholas Grosso vs Arjun Ramakrishnan / Tristan Wise3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Maher vs Masami Surisawa3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Matthew Vaughan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.46
Nicholas Grosso
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.34
Paul Arciero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Maher
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
David Clay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Joan Marc Fajula
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Noah Arciero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephane Legris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephane Legris + Noah Arciero123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Vaughan
34W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.65
Nicholas Grosso
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.46
Paul Arciero
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.34
4.5
David Maher
20W–8L career · type M · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
David Clay
84W–77L career · 1 line in 2024
43%57%<1%
4.03
Joan Marc Fajula
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Noah Arciero
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephane Legris
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.