Teams

EE:Heavy Balls:Racine

2021 VT Tri-Level Men · 4.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-23vs EE:SharkeyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Racine / ALEX RACINE vs David Sharkey / Lowell Thompson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-20vs EE:Not My Fault:KnickerbockerLost 01
L#1 DoublesALEX RACINE / Caleb Darkes-Burkey vs Jerry Knickerbocker / David Knickerbocker6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-10-30vs EE:SharkeyWon 10
W#1 DoublesALEX RACINE / Michael Racine vs David Sharkey / Lowell Thompson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-10-01vs EE:Not My Fault:KnickerbockerWon 10
W#1 DoublesALEX RACINE / Caleb Darkes-Burkey vs Jerry Knickerbocker / Drew Bennett6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

ALEX RACINE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Caleb Darkes-Burkey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.57
Michael Racine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caleb Darkes-Burkey + ALEX RACINE10558% games+5.3% vs expected
Michael Racine + Caleb Darkes-Burkey4356% games−3.3% vs expected
Michael Racine + ALEX RACINE213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
ALEX RACINE
29W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Caleb Darkes-Burkey
38W–19L career · 8 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Michael Racine
25W–37L career · 8 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.