Teams

Escambia - RS/Wilson

2022 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-02-22vs Haigler - RS HardSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRene Abel / Craig Abel vs Nena Haigler / Alex McCrory2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJerry Clark / Betsy Dubose vs Sharon Powell / Rick Bucco0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-02-08vs Gowens - RS HardWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Abel / Rene Abel vs Glenn Gowens / Kaye Whittenberger7-6, 6-2
2022-02-01vs Llanera RS-HardWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanice Clark / Jerry Clark vs Jody Link / Venus Prince6-1, 6-1
2022-01-31vs Gowens - RS HardWon 10
W#2 DoublesCraig Abel / Rene Abel vs Carl Wernicke / Stacy Wilks6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-18vs Haigler - RS HardLost 01
L#2 DoublesJerry Clark / Janice Clark vs Alex McCrory / Allison McCrory4-6, 5-7
2022-01-11vs Hamilton - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Abel / Rene Abel vs Dax Campbell / Courtney Fell6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJerry Clark / Janice Clark vs Rod Hamilton / Sonnie Maughan6-4, 6-3
2022-01-04vs Ross - RS HardWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Abel / Rene Abel vs Mike Esmonde / Cassandra Lievrouw6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Rene Abel
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.55
Nick Farkas
published
3.27
Craig Abel
published 3.5
3.22
Clay Anderson
published 3.5
3.21
Jerry Clark
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Jill Wilson
published
2.88
Ryan Sellars
published
2.84
Janice Clark
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Abel + Rene Abel5360% gamesnot enough data
Nick Farkas + Rene Abel4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rene Abel
122W–57L career · type A · 11 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
Nick Farkas
50W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Craig Abel
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Clay Anderson
36W–19L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.21
Jill Wilson
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Ryan Sellars
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Gregory McWherter
3W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Janice Clark
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.