Teams

LOS GATOS SR 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-24vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5DSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLauren Denevi / Lorraine Mc Carthy vs Liz Lawler / Jennifer Koo6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesCharla Serbent vs Camille Freeman2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Lee / Kathleen Watson vs Mai Tran / Melissa Vuckovich6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPauline Teunissen / Janice Altknecht vs Marnie Mar / Debby Heicklen1-6, 0-6
2025-01-09vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5DWon 31
W#1 DoublesMary Jo Lee / Kathleen Watson vs Debby Heicklen / Theresa Dao-Makiyama6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAmy Beth Hansman vs Robyn Baumstein4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLorraine Mc Carthy / Emily Burns vs Camille Freeman / Melissa Vuckovich4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPauline Teunissen / Jing Welch vs Jeanette Dayan / Andrea Coleman6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Lauren Denevi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Jing Welch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Emily Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Pauline Teunissen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Charla Serbent
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Lisa Baumert
published
3.28
Lorraine Mc Carthy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Kathleen Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Jennifer Haggerty
published
3.19
Debbie Ryan
published 3.5
3.17
Mary Jo Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Amy Beth Hansman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Elizabeth Stukan
published
2.99
Michelle Yoo
published
2.79
Janice Altknecht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Haik Russell
published
2.69
Sharon Elder
published
2.60
Vicki Velez
published
Sherry Keogh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline Teunissen + Lisa Baumert2443% games−9.0% vs expected
Lorraine Mc Carthy + Lisa Baumert224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Beth Hansman + Pauline Teunissen314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Denevi + Lisa Baumert303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Haggerty + Pauline Teunissen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Denevi
39W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Jing Welch
20W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Emily Burns
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Pauline Teunissen
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Charla Serbent
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Lisa Baumert
34W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Lorraine Mc Carthy
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Kathleen Watson
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Jennifer Haggerty
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Debbie Ryan
5W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Mary Jo Lee
10W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Amy Beth Hansman
13W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Elizabeth Stukan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Michelle Yoo
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Janice Altknecht
3W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Haik Russell
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Sharon Elder
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Vicki Velez
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Sherry Keogh
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.