Teams

RR BASS

2025 Fall FW Ladies 50 & Over Social League · Monday Ladies 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-27vs BIR GIANCOTTILost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Berry / Dee Tarver vs Gina Godsey / Marcela Romero3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Conant / Belita Townsend vs Lynn Carlson / Kathy Ewen3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDianne Dugan / Linda Lapointe vs Kylie Giancotti / Preeti Rangee6-3, 6-1
2025-10-20vs MCL HULSEY/HOCHSTERWon 30
W#1 DoublesDee Tarver / Jayne Gornik vs Anne Ferguson / Megan Bennett7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Conant / Deborah Iverson vs Dana Rosenstein / Laura Schrengohst6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCatherine Bass / Joyce Kain vs Linda Hochster / Christi Handy6-3, 6-1
2025-10-06vs BIR GIANCOTTILost 12
L#1 DoublesLana Doggett / Anita Zimmerman vs Gina Godsey / Renee Yackira1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJayne Gornik / Belita Townsend vs Annette Hanson / Barbarita Nieri5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoyce Kain / Dianne Dugan vs Patty Hart / Vivian Hoff6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-09-29vs MCL HULSEY/HOCHSTERWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Bent / Susan Berry vs Megan Bennett / Anne Ferguson4-6, 4-3
W#2 DoublesLana Doggett / Anita Zimmerman vs Dana Rosenstein / Linda Hochster6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCatherine Bass / Kimberly Juneau vs LINDA FEATHERSTONE / Lisa Mills6-1, 6-1
2025-09-15vs BIR GIANCOTTILost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Berry / Kimberly Juneau vs Julie Baugh / Renee Yackira2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDee Tarver / Jayne Gornik vs Laura Spears / Paige Whitmire6-3
L#3 DoublesLinda Lapointe / Dianne Dugan vs Karen Maggi / Vivian Hoff2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-08vs MCL HULSEY/HOCHSTERWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Bent / Lana Doggett vs Christi Handy / Judy Hulsey6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDee Tarver / Anita Zimmerman vs Anne Ferguson / Dana Rosenstein6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoyce Kain / Deborah Iverson vs LINDA FEATHERSTONE / Janet Kasper6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Monday Ladies 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Belita Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barbara Bent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Deborah Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Heidi Mireiter
published 3.5
3.12
Lana Doggett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Dee Tarver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Anita Zimmerman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Kimberly Juneau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Linda Lapointe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Catherine Bass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dianne Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jayne Gornik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Joyce Kain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Conant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Bass + Joyce Kain5552% gamesnot enough data
Anita Zimmerman + Dianne Dugan2343% gamesnot enough data
Anita Zimmerman + Lana Doggett123 matchesnot enough data
Belita Townsend + Jayne Gornik213 matchesnot enough data
Belita Townsend + Julie Conant033 matchesnot enough data
Lana Doggett + Linda Lapointe123 matchesnot enough data
Lana Doggett + Dee Tarver123 matchesnot enough data
Lana Doggett + Susan Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belita Townsend
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Bent
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Iverson
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Heidi Mireiter
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Lana Doggett
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dee Tarver
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Anita Zimmerman
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Kimberly Juneau
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
Linda Lapointe
50W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Catherine Bass
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Dianne Dugan
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jayne Gornik
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joyce Kain
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Conant
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Berry
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.