Teams

LFNT:TryingWickedHard:Crowley

2025 EMA Tri Level Winter · Spring

6 players · average NTRP 5.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-07vs WESB:Westboro:Benoit/CarrollWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Schmid / Hayley Doria vs Mary Carroll / Lindsay Benoit6-2, 6-1
2025-06-04vs WESB:Westboro:WangWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Liang / CariAnne Kreml vs Cassy Waung / Michelle Lo6-2, 6-2
2025-05-18vs WOB:Woburn:MessinaWon 10
W#1 DoublesHayley Doria / Jenna Schmid vs Grace Messina / Alison Shanahan6-2, 6-4
2025-05-16vs WESB:Westboro:WangWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Liang / Marybeth Liang vs Botum Bennett / Michelle Lo6-0, 6-0
2025-04-13vs WESB:Westboro:Benoit/CarrollLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarybeth Liang / Jenna Schmid vs Lindsay Benoit / Mary Carroll7-5, 1-5, 0-1
2025-04-06vs WOB:Woburn:MessinaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenna Schmid / Hayley Doria vs Alison Shanahan / Jess Bullitt6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Jenna Schmid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.51
Hayley Doria
published
4.48
Michelle Liang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
Marybeth Liang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
CariAnne Kreml
published 5
Lauren Crowley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marybeth Liang + Michelle Liang8360% games+8.2% vs expected
Hayley Doria + Jenna Schmid6072% gamesnot enough data
CariAnne Kreml + Michelle Liang303 matchesnot enough data
Marybeth Liang + Jenna Schmid213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Schmid
30W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
Hayley Doria
48W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.51
Michelle Liang
73W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
4.48
Marybeth Liang
109W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.42
5
CariAnne Kreml
121W–72L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.38
Lauren Crowley
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.