Teams

Good Gravy-Snyder

2019 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Tami McAra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-07-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Tina Farrelly / Jennifer Scott6-3, 6-4
2019-07-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Holly Kanz / Danielle Cuenco6-2, 7-6
2019-07-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Erin Hill / Kari Hastings7-6, 6-3
2019-06-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Susha Pratt / Elise Anderson6-2, 6-4
2019-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Heike Droste / Laura Maginnis6-4, 6-2
2019-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Irene Feldun / Jennifer Woodard6-1, 6-4
2019-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Irene Feldun / Gwen Olsen7-5, 6-3
2019-06-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Paula Jacobson / Janine Wood7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Tami McAra
148W–117L career
6%94%0%
3.63
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.