Teams

AR/Ritch/HSV

2026 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-30vs AR/Crum/NWAWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Robinson / William Hawkins vs Val Robison / John Bakalekos5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMike Ritch / Pete Owens vs Brian Keck / Malcolm Hayward6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDan Johnson / Mickey Robertson vs Kevin McCotter / Herbert Crum6-0, 6-0
2026-04-29vs LA/Boyd/Bossier CityLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdward Barbot / Floyd Lang vs Robert Burleson / Michael Doles2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPete Owens / Mike Ritch vs James Gilcrease / Clifford Ashton6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-29vs AR/Wallman/Bella VistaLost 12
W#1 DoublesDan Johnson / Mickey Robertson vs Lou Wallman / Steve Bothwell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Hawkins / Bill Barnes vs Jeffrey York / Joseph Miller1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFloyd Lang / Edward Barbot vs Keith Faber / Cyril Severns2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA/Boyd/Bossier City3081342
2AR/Ritch/HSV12361384
3AR/Crum/NWA03271492

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
William Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Mickey Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Pete Owens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Bill Barnes
published 3
2.69
Mike Ritch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Floyd Lang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.27
Edward Barbot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Floyd Lang + Mickey Robertson4347% games+3.4% vs expected
Mike Ritch + Edward Barbot213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Hawkins
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Mickey Robertson
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Pete Owens
17W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Bill Barnes
4W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Ritch
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Floyd Lang
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Edward Barbot
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.