Teams

EW-YTC-Flyckt

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-04-30vs EW-WCCP-TombariLost 12
L#1 DoublesArti Smith / Martha Marchand vs Marie Lambert / Nancy Bettesworth1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen McIver / Lory Allen vs Jeneen Barratt / Stephanie Butler1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Bickley / Kimberlee Foster vs Pamela Farley / Shirlee Steiner1-6, 3-6
2023-04-29vs EW-WCCP-TombariLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt vs Nancy Bettesworth / Marie Lambert5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Bickley / Kathy Dinwiddie vs Voni Tombari / Jeneen Barratt3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Marchand / Arti Smith vs Pamela Farley / Cheryl Stransky3-6, 4-6
2023-04-29vs EW-WCCP-TombariLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt vs Voni Tombari / Stephanie Butler3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesArti Smith / Martha Marchand vs Muriel Blevins / Shirlee Steiner6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberlee Foster / Lory Allen vs Cheryl Stransky / Marian Menke0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Kathleen McIver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Joyce Flyckt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Lory Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.22
Martha Marchand
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy Dinwiddie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Bickley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen McIver + Joyce Flyckt7355% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen McIver + Lory Allen2337% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen McIver + Kathy Dinwiddie224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen McIver
56W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
Joyce Flyckt
23W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Lory Allen
23W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Martha Marchand
9W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.22
Kathy Dinwiddie
3W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Susan Bickley
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.