Teams

Rhoads/Add-Ins (F)

2025 Adult 18 & Over Fall · Men 3.0 (F)

21 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-15vs Voelker/Duggan (F)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesRyan Morgan / Rick Sutton vs Asim Hasanovic / James Trevor4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBrandon Edstrom vs Brent Jones0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLes Brugere / Santosh Singh vs Bill Etling / Patrick McWard1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesClinton Brant vs Samer Alkaade6-3, 5-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKermit Boschert / Steve Uelhof vs Luke Elias / Bryan Mason6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-12-08vs Harris/Strohmeyer (F)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesBHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI / Jeff Willmann vs Jason Parmentier / JR Ross6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRobert Hart vs Johnny Wang1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVikram Datir / Vikas Lohchab vs Hal Harris / Kenneth Fredrick6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrandon Edstrom vs Neil Suthar0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Uelhof / Les Brugere vs Matt Junidi / Adam Rider6-4, 6-5
2024-09-08vs Voelker/Duggan (F)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesBHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI / Rick Sutton vs Asim Hasanovic / James Trevor2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRobert Hart vs Brent Jones0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesOrlando Phillips / Shujat A Qalbani vs David Busker / Patrick McWard6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesClinton Brant vs Samer Alkaade1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Uelhof / Kermit Boschert vs David Irby / Bryan Mason4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 (F) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Ryan Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Orlando Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Clinton Brant
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
BHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Dorukhan Doruk
published
2.72
Brandon Edstrom
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.67
Vikram Datir
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Vijay Reddy
published
2.65
Steve Uelhof
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Allen Capdeboscq
published 3
2.63
Tom Rhoads
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Robert Hart
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.57
Kermit Boschert
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.53
Jason Briggs
published
2.53
Les Brugere
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jason Ashton
published
Jeff Willmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Santosh Singh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shujat A Qalbani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vikas Lohchab
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

BHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI + Jeff Willmann7351% games+4.4% vs expected
BHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI + Robert Hart3349% games+2.5% vs expected
BHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI + Dorukhan Doruk1443% games−0.7% vs expected
Steve Uelhof + Jason Briggs1440% games−1.7% vs expected
Kermit Boschert + Steve Uelhof322752% games−5.2% vs expected
BHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI + Ryan Morgan224 matchesnot enough data
Vikram Datir + Vikas Lohchab044 matchesnot enough data
Steve Uelhof + BHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Morgan
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
Orlando Phillips
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Clinton Brant
12W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
BHEEMESWARA RAO ANKATHI
22W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Dorukhan Doruk
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brandon Edstrom
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Vikram Datir
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Vijay Reddy
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Steve Uelhof
74W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Allen Capdeboscq
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Tom Rhoads
57W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Robert Hart
14W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Kermit Boschert
49W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Jason Briggs
26W–51L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Les Brugere
3W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Jason Ashton
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Willmann
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rick Sutton
13W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Santosh Singh
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shujat A Qalbani
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vikas Lohchab
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.