Teams

Druid Hills (Carrie Parker)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Low · 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Monica Murray

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Low (Check Eligibility List) - Monica Murray have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Lena Murphy
published
3.73
Melissa Hills
published
3.66
Christy Brock
published 4
3.64
Elizabeth Roeser
published
3.63
Jill Wells
published
3.60
Shelley Giberson
published
3.59
Shannon Kettering
published
3.58
Sara Auld
published
3.53
Stephanie Ricker
published
3.52
Margaret Harris
published
3.39
Carrie Parker
published 3.5
3.34
Elizabeth Ledet
published
3.23
Joan Beaulieu
published
3.23
Lynne Kushner
published
3.21
Niccole Burton
published
3.11
Charlotte Geletka
published 3.5
3.06
Jamie Bonds
published
Julie Grant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Harris + Julie Grant2450% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Giberson + Margaret Harris4168% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Harris + Carrie Parker134 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Harris + Elizabeth Roeser314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Roeser + Christy Brock314 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Kushner + Carrie Parker123 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Giberson + Christy Brock213 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Bonds + Charlotte Geletka213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lena Murphy
26W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Melissa Hills
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Christy Brock
33W–24L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Elizabeth Roeser
18W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jill Wells
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Shelley Giberson
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Shannon Kettering
16W–26L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Sara Auld
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Stephanie Ricker
23W–45L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.53
Margaret Harris
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Carrie Parker
21W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Elizabeth Ledet
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Joan Beaulieu
19W–25L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lynne Kushner
32W–33L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Niccole Burton
45W–36L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Charlotte Geletka
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Jamie Bonds
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Julie Grant
21W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.