Teams

Gillispie/LR/Rebs

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-01-23vs Virden/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 SinglesJessica Buchman vs Anne Virden6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKaitlin Cockerell vs Wendy Dawson6-4, 1-6
W#3 SinglesElizabeth Gillispie vs Paige Shields6-0, 6-4
2025-12-10vs Rutledge/LR/RebsWon 20
W#1 SinglesKathy Wild vs Sara Jennings7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJessica Buchman vs Abigail Obana6-1, 6-0
2025-12-02vs Compton/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 SinglesHolly Driver vs Cristie Hughes5-7, 1-4
W#2 SinglesCarole George vs Kristi Shirley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMacKenzie Cole vs Kelly Hall6-7, 2-6
2025-11-17vs Bulmanski/LR/PVCCWon 21
L#1 SinglesKathy Wild vs Annie Hogate7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCarole George vs Julie Miller5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHolly Driver vs Heidi Brandt6-4, 6-0
2025-11-12vs Bartlett/Sherwood/STCLost 03
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Gillispie vs Michelle Bruzatori0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAlison Caballero vs Casey Bartlett1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMacKenzie Cole vs Brady Scruggs4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Carole George
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.45
Jessica Buchman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.44
Alison Caballero
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.38
Kaitlin Cockerell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.35
Holly Driver
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.35
Kathy Wild
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.27
Elizabeth Gillispie
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
MacKenzie Cole
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Driver + Carole George2449% games+11.4% vs expected
Holly Driver + Kathy Wild044 matchesnot enough data
Carole George + Kathy Wild123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carole George
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
Jessica Buchman
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Alison Caballero
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44
Kaitlin Cockerell
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.38
3
Holly Driver
18W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Kathy Wild
22W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.35
2.5
Elizabeth Gillispie
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
MacKenzie Cole
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.