Teams

LEdgar.40C-UNC

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

14 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 15 6:30 PM
UNC Faculty Staff Recreation Association
Sep 22 6:30 PM
UNC Faculty Staff Recreation Association
Sep 29 8:00 PM
Hollow Rock Racquet Club
Oct 6 6:30 PM
UNC Faculty Staff Recreation Association
2026-09-08vs LBible.40.7.5C-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlli Kintner / Jean Haas vs Sarah Motsinger / Anne Confer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Tarrant / Alyse Levine vs Loralie Bible / Cary Armstrong3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Edgar / Amy Shaheen vs Santae Cooper / Judy Faubert6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-09-01vs TPerrone.40C-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Tarrant / Alyse Levine vs Meghan Howard / Sara Velarde2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Watkins / Lynn Edgar vs Stacy Rank / Terry Perrone5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Lanford / Frances Wilson vs Miranda Harmon / Angela Baxley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-25vs JBarrow.7.5C-HRWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlli Kintner / Jean Haas vs Jenni Mitchell / Doreen Sanfelici6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Watkins / Marti Jenkins vs Denise Olson / Rebecca Georgi6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEllen Reich / Kate Elia vs Joelle Romac / Johana Sykorova6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-18vs HHerndon-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeidi Lanford / Lynn Edgar vs Jennifer Mersereau / Sheridan Meltsner6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Watkins / Marti Jenkins vs Kelly Jarrett / Noreen McDonald2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTerri Tarrant / Ellen Reich vs Regina Davis / Ulrike Foley2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HHerndon-CHTC1030115
2TPerrone.40C-DUR1021223
3KLaan.40.7.5C-DUR1021227
4LBible.40.7.5C-DUR0112427
5JBarrow.7.5C-HR0112431
6LEdgar.40C-UNC0103633

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kate Elia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Alli Kintner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Amy Shaheen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Lynn Edgar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Terri Tarrant
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Marti Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Jean Haas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Heidi Lanford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Alyse Levine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Cheryl Stevens
published 3.5
3.33
Melinda Vigolo
published
3.28
Frances Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Donna Heider
published 3.5
2.94
Ellen Reich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Lanford + Alyse Levine2339% gamesnot enough data
Alli Kintner + Jean Haas314 matchesnot enough data
Marti Jenkins + Donna Heider314 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Edgar + Kate Elia303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kate Elia
44W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Alli Kintner
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Amy Shaheen
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Edgar
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.59
4
Terri Tarrant
9W–36L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Marti Jenkins
35W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Jean Haas
39W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
4
Heidi Lanford
31W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Alyse Levine
31W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Cheryl Stevens
37W–30L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Melinda Vigolo
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Frances Wilson
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Donna Heider
7W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Ellen Reich
76W–86L career · 3 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.