Teams

Greenhill/Thornton-Hark W3.5F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-24vs The Lakes TA/Akbany-Little W3.5FSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKeri Anderson vs Christie Rymsza1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulieta McRorie / Cathy Langland vs Debi Meuret / Karen McLeland6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulieta McRorie / Cathy Langland vs Patricia Thoma / Beverly Vucekovich2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKeri Anderson vs Allison Ludwig7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClaudine Vazquez / Amanda Forrest vs Tara Hooper / Julia Cisneros3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Bullard / Julieta McRorie vs Patti Kaiser / Karen Springer6-0, 6-0
2025-09-26vs Eldorado/Miller W3.5FWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudine Vazquez / Amanda Forrest vs Melissa Berg / Amy MacNicol6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLily Fish / Julieta McRorie vs Jie Lin / HUIHSIEN CHANG7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKeri Anderson vs Theresa Lane6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCathy Langland / Julieta McRorie vs Cristine Giacchino / Julie Binion6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarianne Hark / Claudine Vazquez vs Maia Lamarque / Phuong Nguyen7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarianne Hark / Julieta McRorie vs Tori Schoen / Kathy Reddin6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Amanda Forrest
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.44
Stephanie Shah
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
3.29
Suzannah Cronenwett
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
3.28
Keri Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Julie Bullard
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Joy Sebold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.22
Julieta McRorie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Cathy Langland
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.22
Wincy Tomecko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Claudine Vazquez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Erin Baldwin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Talia Pouratian
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Lily Fish
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jackie Fogle
published
Marianne Hark
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Baldwin + Amanda Forrest6359% games−1.6% vs expected
Stephanie Shah + Joy Sebold6545% games−2.3% vs expected
Julieta McRorie + Cathy Langland3345% gamesnot enough data
Wincy Tomecko + Talia Pouratian1438% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Shah + Talia Pouratian213 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Langland + Julie Bullard123 matchesnot enough data
Erin Baldwin + Julie Bullard123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Bullard + Amanda Forrest303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Forrest
23W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Stephanie Shah
29W–21L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Suzannah Cronenwett
28W–6L career · 14 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Keri Anderson
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Julie Bullard
14W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Joy Sebold
16W–23L career · 12 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Julieta McRorie
7W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cathy Langland
10W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Wincy Tomecko
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Claudine Vazquez
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Erin Baldwin
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Talia Pouratian
11W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Lily Fish
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jackie Fogle
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Marianne Hark
10W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.