Teams

Escambia/Haigler55&Over6.0X

2025 Escambia Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-08vs Holmes - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonathan Llanera / Nena Haigler vs KL LeCOQ / Candy Zuleger6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBeau Bullard / Klara Szalai vs Robert Cruise / Allison McCrory6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesA Haigler / Mary Brann vs Alex McCrory / Wendy McIntosh Holmes7-6, 6-0
2025-10-01vs Holmes - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesA Haigler / Susan Rice vs KL LeCOQ / Candy Zuleger7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRick Bucco / Judy Harrington vs Robert Cruise / Allison McCrory6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Mary Brann vs Kathy Ross / Marty Stanovich6-1, 6-2
2025-09-10vs Holmes - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Smith / Susan Rice vs KL LeCOQ / Wendy McIntosh Holmes5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-09-03vs Holmes - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesJim Smith / Judy Harrington vs KL LeCOQ / Wendy McIntosh Holmes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-27vs Holmes - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesBeau Bullard / Klara Szalai vs KL LeCOQ / Candy Zuleger3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRick Bucco / Susan Rice vs Robert Cruise / Kathy Ross6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJonathan Llanera / Judy Harrington vs James Grant / Allison McCrory7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Susan Rice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Victor Agadzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Klara Szalai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Judy Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Beau Bullard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Jonathan Llanera
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
A Haigler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Rick Bucco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jim Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Brann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nena Haigler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Rice
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
Victor Agadzi
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Klara Szalai
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
Judy Harrington
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Beau Bullard
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jonathan Llanera
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
A Haigler
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Rick Bucco
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Jim Smith
83W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Mary Brann
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nena Haigler
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.