Teams

Ju.Andrews18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-23vs Ca.Grimes18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaroline Wall / Kelly Jones vs Rachel Pisciotta / Beth Holden2-6, 2-6
2024-09-16vs La.Redmond18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesDorsey Manning / Caroline Wall vs Traci Crabtree / Ana Maria Allessi2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-09vs Cl.Owens18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham vs Diana Kennedy / Michaela DeSoucey6-0, 6-4
2024-09-03vs Ka.Johnston18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooke Jenkins / Parker Rumley vs Lindsay Murdock / Cari DeCandia2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Wall / Tate Garrison vs Karen Johnston / Naomi Rodrigues4-6, 1-6
2024-08-20vs Do.Hovis18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesParker Rumley / Melissa Burke vs Michele Storr / Elizabeth Bieber6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCaroline Wall / Katherine Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-19vs Pa.Hankerson18C6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesJulianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham vs Sarah Wireback / Ashley McRae6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMA Allen / Parker Rumley vs Michelle Mills / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall5-7, 2-6
2024-08-12vs Ch.Waychoff18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham vs Melissa Proctor / Michelle Kurtz6-3, 6-1
2024-08-05vs Li.Kempf18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Burke / Parker Rumley vs Jessica Phillips / Heather Tuttle4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrooke Jenkins / Jennifer Badham vs Liza Eaton / Griffin Lamb6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCaroline Wall / Katherine Williams vs Betsy Fulcher / Emily Larson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Jennifer Badham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Julianne Andrews
published
3.17
Parker Rumley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Mary-Peyton Amburn
published
3.04
MA Allen
published
2.98
Caroline Wall
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.95
Tate Garrison
published
2.80
Dorsey Manning
published
Lorah Henry
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Badham
87W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.65
Julianne Andrews
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Parker Rumley
26W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Mary-Peyton Amburn
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
MA Allen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Caroline Wall
96W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Tate Garrison
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Dorsey Manning
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
Lorah Henry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.