Teams

Dallas/JB/RPCC

2025 Mixed 40 & Over 3.5, 4.5 · 3.5 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-22vs Wade-Cissell/JB/3OaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Dallas / Lorie Whitby vs Mark Jumper / Jenny Box6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChris Evins / Brooke Burris vs Don Threm / Mandy Folden4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRichard Daniel / Cherry Dallas vs Grant Goodart / Amanda Windmeyer6-1, 6-1
2025-07-14vs Wade-Cissell/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Hill / Andrea Seeman vs Mark Jumper / Leah Willett4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLorie Whitby / Chris Evins vs Don Threm / Shannon Crocker3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Milton / Chamblee Witherspoon vs Jason Davis / Lindi Wade6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-08vs Wade-Cissell/JB/3OaksWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Evins / Lorie Whitby vs Don Threm / Shannon Crocker2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Daniel / Cherry Dallas vs Mark Jumper / Leah Willett6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-09vs Wade-Cissell/JB/3OaksWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Evins / Chamblee Witherspoon vs Brandon Gates / Amanda Windmeyer4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Daniel / Brooke Burris vs Don Threm / Leah Willett6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrew Dallas / Andrea Seeman vs Jenny Box / Grant Goodart6-2, 6-1
2025-05-28vs Wade-Cissell/JB/3OaksLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Daniel / Lorie Whitby vs Grant Goodart / Shannon Crocker6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRichard Milton / Andrea Seeman vs Don Threm / Mandy Folden4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCherry Dallas / John Hill vs Lindi Wade / Jason Davis6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Richard Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Cherry Dallas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Andrew Dallas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Lorie Whitby
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Chris Evins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Brooke Burris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Chamblee Witherspoon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Andrea Seeman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Richard Milton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherry Dallas + Richard Daniel8258% games+4.5% vs expected
Cherry Dallas + Andrew Dallas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Daniel
33W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Cherry Dallas
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Andrew Dallas
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
Lorie Whitby
28W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Chris Evins
33W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Brooke Burris
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Chamblee Witherspoon
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Andrea Seeman
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Richard Milton
32W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.