Teams

KFranks (PPRSC)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Men - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-17vs BGibson (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesChuck Norton / Tim Hausmann vs Dana Haake / Todd Price3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-03vs MMerkel (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris McIver / Douglas Powell vs Rick Haskell / Robert Sledd1-6, 6-7
2023-09-26vs JHorton (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChuck Norton / Tim Hausmann vs Brady Koesel / Vikram Datta5-7, 3-6
2023-09-12vs BStover (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChuck Norton / Chris McIver vs Robert Shore / Brian Hegner3-6, 2-6
2023-09-05vs PMayo/RWilliamson (JCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris McIver / Robert Kerr vs John Haviland / Matt Zimmerman6-7, 3-6
2023-08-29vs JSchoore/JButurff (Lifetime)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTim Hausmann / Nathan Dunn vs Prakhar Paharia / Oren Golanski0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris McIver / Robert Kerr vs Jinwook Chung / Charles Manning4-6, 3-6
2023-08-22vs PKinney (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKent Franks / Trevor Zimmer vs Sam Moran / Matt Kinser5-7, 5-7
2023-08-16vs IKlass (Windyrush)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTrevor Zimmer / Kent Franks vs Matt Livoti / Daniel Holden2-6, 2-6
2023-08-08vs AHunt (Matthews)Split 11
L#1 DoublesTim Hausmann / Chuck Norton vs David Whiteman / David Richards0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKent Franks / Trevor Zimmer vs Chris Lucas / Joe Glass2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Thomas Hull
published
3.46
Kent Franks
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Chris McIver
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Tim Hausmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Alan Roll
published 3.5
3.13
Douglas Powell
published
3.01
Trevor Zimmer
published
3.00
Chuck Norton
published 3
Nathan Dunn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trevor Zimmer + Chuck Norton3258% games+5.7% vs expected
Chris McIver + Kent Franks134 matchesnot enough data
Tim Hausmann + Kent Franks134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Hull
18W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Kent Franks
107W–92L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Chris McIver
48W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Tim Hausmann
55W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alan Roll
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Douglas Powell
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Trevor Zimmer
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Chuck Norton
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Nathan Dunn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.