Teams

NJD/DeBarbadillo

Tri Level Advancing 2024 5.0 · 5.0 TRI

17 players · average NTRP 4.44 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-12vs Tri LuvWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Pancha / Amie Villarini vs Carol Hammond / Janine Roth5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Rosenthal / Sarah Tirone vs Jennifer Cane / Alice Napolitano6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLiane van Etten / Antoinette Welsh vs Caroll Fry / Dina Margulies3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-06vs NassauWon 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Hall / Amy Collins vs Elise Gerdes / Carolina Lojan6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Rosenthal / Melissa Hammer vs Miell Yi / Lauren Olsen6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLiane van Etten / Antoinette Welsh vs Shannon Boczon / Mary Chion2-6, 6-7
2024-09-28vs FaviaWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarin Weiner / Amy Collins vs Daniela Kelley / Kelly Meyers7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Wells / Jill Olman vs Suzanne Favia / Sladja Carton6-7, 1-2
W#3 DoublesKimberly Derr / Maria Vitale vs Courtney McCormick / Sally Finley6-3, 6-4
2024-09-22vs Tri LuvWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanielle Hall / Karin Weiner vs Amy Ankeny / Renee Lee6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Rosenthal / Sarah Tirone vs Marcie Lynch / Jennifer Cane6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDenise Giannone / Amy Hearn vs Christine Braceland / Dani Crooker6-2, 6-4
2024-09-15vs NassauWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Pancha / Elena DeBarbadillo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJill Olman / Karen Wells vs Miell Yi / Elise Gerdes2-6, 4-5
W#3 DoublesAmy Hearn / Denise Giannone vs Melinda Trang / Mary Chion7-5, 3-1
2024-09-08vs FaviaWon 21
W#1 DoublesElena DeBarbadillo / Amie Villarini vs Adrienne Supino / Daniela Kelley7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Tirone / Melissa Hammer vs Sladja Carton / Jennifer Vallillo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Derr / Maria Vitale vs Cherie Rygh / Maritza Dominguez2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 TRI
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJD/DeBarbadillo6012614144
2Tri Luv4213513151
3Nassau2461225177
4Favia0651327191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.75
Elena DeBarbadillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Amie Villarini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.71
Danielle Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.58
Karen Wells
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.49
Karin Weiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.48
Jill Olman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Kimberly Rosenthal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Sarah Tirone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Melissa Hammer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Amy Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
3.95
Denise Giannone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Amy Hearn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Maria Vitale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Liane van Etten
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Antoinette Welsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Kimberly Derr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jill Pancha
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Collins + Danielle Hall4161% games+12.3% vs expected
Denise Giannone + Amy Hearn6159% games+9.2% vs expected
Sarah Tirone + Kimberly Rosenthal15562% games+9.0% vs expected
Liane van Etten + Antoinette Welsh221358% games+7.8% vs expected
Elena DeBarbadillo + Amy Collins381956% games+3.8% vs expected
Melissa Hammer + Kimberly Rosenthal12654% games+3.2% vs expected
Amy Hearn + Liane van Etten13163% games+1.7% vs expected
Kimberly Derr + Maria Vitale822558% games+1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elena DeBarbadillo
115W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.75
5
Amie Villarini
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Danielle Hall
26W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.71
4.5
Karen Wells
39W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
4.58
Karin Weiner
56W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.49
Jill Olman
27W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
4.48
Kimberly Rosenthal
64W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.41
Sarah Tirone
70W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.39
Melissa Hammer
53W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
5
Amy Collins
127W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.13
4.5
Denise Giannone
81W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.95
4
Amy Hearn
120W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Maria Vitale
178W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Liane van Etten
95W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
4
Antoinette Welsh
66W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Kimberly Derr
196W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
Jill Pancha
24W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.