Teams

Horseshoe Bend CC (Monica Mefford)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper)

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Liz Zacharias
published
3.33
Anne French
published 3.5
3.33
3.29
Anne Storey
published 3.5
3.26
Sara Goodwin
published
3.24
Pat Price
published
3.15
Gail Kinney
published
3.15
Michelle Sherman
published
3.14
Patty Spall
published
3.11
Kathi Blevins
published
3.09
Losia Tomlinson
published
3.06
Susan Jankoski
published
3.05
Judith Ross
published
3.01
Monica Mefford
published
2.93
Kathy Heetland
published
2.90
Deborah Warren
published 3.5
2.90
Yvonne Kenny
published
2.63
Melissa Crean
published
Jane Smith
published
Kathleen Harrison
published
Kay Cox
published
Lou Ann Nelson
published
Mary Jo Godbold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathi Blevins + Liz Zacharias5074% games+15.8% vs expected
Losia Tomlinson + Melissa Crean2346% gamesnot enough data
Judith Ross + Kathy Heetland224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Warren + Pat Price134 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Warren + Anne French224 matchesnot enough data
Anne Storey + Michelle Sherman213 matchesnot enough data
Losia Tomlinson + Barbara Hurt-Simmons123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Zacharias
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Anne French
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Barbara Hurt-Simmons
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Anne Storey
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Sara Goodwin
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Pat Price
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Gail Kinney
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Michelle Sherman
17W–24L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Patty Spall
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Kathi Blevins
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Losia Tomlinson
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Susan Jankoski
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Judith Ross
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Monica Mefford
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Kathy Heetland
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
3.5
Deborah Warren
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
Yvonne Kenny
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Melissa Crean
16W–56L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Jane Smith
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Harrison
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kay Cox
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lou Ann Nelson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Jo Godbold
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.