Teams

Williams/Knoxville

2026 Combo 65 & over -Knoxville · 6.5 Combo Women

11 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 5 9:00 AM
Cedar Bluff Racquet Club
Sep 19 9:00 AM
Cedar Bluff Racquet Club
Sep 26 9:00 AM
Cedar Bluff Racquet Club
2026-08-29vs Worrell/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Viehmann / Patti West vs Janice Whitehead / Lila Downs3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Wentz / Susan Pappas vs Teri Henry / Martha Wilds3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Hand / Joy Benson vs Sandy Hodson / Deborah Oxendine3-6, 1-6
2026-08-22vs Worrell/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Dail / Susan Pappas vs Donna Worrell / Mary Vineyard0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPeggy Strand / Margaret Goldman vs Carol Irick / Debra Chaniott6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Hand / Debbie Bryant vs Teri Henry / Martha Wilds2-6, 0-6
2026-08-15vs Worrell/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Susan Pappas vs Teri Henry / Martha Wilds2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShirley Vaughan / Joy Benson vs Janice Whitehead / Lila Downs5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Kathryn Cockrill / Debbie Bryant vs Teresa Helton / Brenda Rayfield7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Williams/Knoxville1021329
2Worrell/Knoxville0112534

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Peggy Strand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Shirley Vaughan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Linda Viehmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Mary Kathryn Cockrill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Margaret Goldman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Lucy Hand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Karen Dail
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Linda Dayringer
published
2.75
Susan Pappas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Joy Benson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Patti West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy Strand
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Shirley Vaughan
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Linda Viehmann
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Mary Kathryn Cockrill
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Margaret Goldman
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Lucy Hand
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.94
Karen Dail
3W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Linda Dayringer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Susan Pappas
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
Joy Benson
27W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Patti West
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.