Teams

RP: Levesque

2024 RI Adult 55 & Over Men · 6.0 Men 1

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-22vs FC: Travers/RinaldiWon 21
W#1 DoublesBill Gaule / Robert Ringman vs Anthony Rinaldi / Sam Dalou6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Graumann / Bruce Kolovson vs Steve Dakin / Alan Cornell6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJack Coffey / David Provensal vs Chip Speicher / Thomas McHugh2-6, 4-6
2024-08-21vs RP: Joan SteereLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Kolovson / Robert Ringman vs MICHAEL FONTAINE / Erick Hartz4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesGerald Levesque / David Provensal vs Richard Accetta / Alan Dyl2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHarvey Alberg / Mark Brown vs Timothy Herbert / Ramesh Murthy0-6, 3-6
2024-08-14vs RP: Joan SteereLost 03
L#1 DoublesBruce Kolovson / Richard Graumann vs Scott Racine / Erick Hartz3-6, 6-1, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRichard McCahey / Robert Ringman vs Christopher Donnelly / Richard Accetta5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMohan Mahadevan / Richard Mable vs David Johnson / Timothy Herbert4-6, 3-6
2024-08-12vs RP: Joan SteereWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Graumann / Robert Ringman vs David Johnson / Christopher Donnelly6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBill Gaule / Bruce Kolovson vs Timothy Herbert / Byron Kinniburgh7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJack Coffey / Gerald Levesque vs Ramesh Murthy / Erick Hartz2-6, 2-6
2024-08-05vs RP: Joan SteereLost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard McCahey / Richard Mable vs Alan Dyl / Richard Accetta3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Ringman / Jack Coffey vs Christopher Donnelly / Byron Kinniburgh2-6, 3-6
2024-07-30vs FC: Travers/RinaldiLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Graumann / Bruce Kolovson vs Michael Robinson / Sam Dalou5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDenis Fortier / Bill Gaule vs William Conroy / Bob Iaconis6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Provensal / Mark Brown vs Chip Speicher / Russell Heaton3-6, 0-6
2024-06-26vs FC: Travers/RinaldiWon 21
L#1 DoublesRichard Graumann / Robert Ringman vs Anthony Rinaldi / Michael Robinson5-7, 6-1, 1-3
W#2 DoublesDenis Fortier / Bill Gaule vs Thomas McHugh / Chip Speicher6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMohan Mahadevan / Richard Mable vs Alan Cornell / William Conroy7-6, 4-3
2024-06-13vs FC: Travers/RinaldiWon 21
W#1 DoublesDenis Fortier / Bill Gaule vs Bob Iaconis / Michael Robinson1-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBruce Kolovson / Richard Graumann vs Russell Heaton / Thomas McHugh6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRobert Henderson / Harvey Alberg vs Chip Speicher / William Conroy7-5, 4-6, 0-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RP: Joan Steere0818613167
2RP: Levesque0891531250
3FC: Travers/Rinaldi0891533257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Bill Gaule
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.83
Denis Fortier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Richard Graumann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
David Provensal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Bruce Kolovson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Gerald Levesque
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Harvey Alberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mohan Mahadevan
published
Richard Mable
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard McCahey
published
Robert Ringman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Kolovson + Richard Graumann4650% gamesnot enough data
Denis Fortier + Bill Gaule4350% gamesnot enough data
Robert Ringman + Richard Graumann2447% gamesnot enough data
Robert Ringman + Bruce Kolovson033 matchesnot enough data
Robert Ringman + Bill Gaule123 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Kolovson + Denis Fortier213 matchesnot enough data
Gerald Levesque + Jack Coffey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bill Gaule
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Denis Fortier
41W–51L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
2.83
Richard Graumann
57W–51L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
David Provensal
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Bruce Kolovson
36W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
Gerald Levesque
5W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Harvey Alberg
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jack Coffey
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mohan Mahadevan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Mable
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard McCahey
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Ringman
6W–31L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.