Teams

C2 Westwood Jones

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Men 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesJackson Dyer / Joseph Jones vs Michael MacDougall / Anthony Katsarelis7-5, 6-3
2021-05-23vs C7 Salisbury TillerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJackson Dyer / Danny Wade vs Gaurav Shrestha / Chris Jamison6-2, 6-2
2021-05-16vs C1 Willow Oaks Sibley/EllesLost 01
L#2 SinglesJackson Dyer vs Scott Boyle3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-05-09Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJackson Dyer vs Christian Mosier3-6, 3-6
2021-04-18vs C5 Woodlake MonstelloWon 10
W#1 DoublesJackson Dyer / Corbin Dryden vs Matthew Loman / Dan Joyce6-2, 6-0
2021-04-11Won 10
W#2 SinglesJackson Dyer vs Robert Partington6-3, 6-0
2021-04-10vs C8 Dominion SpillareWon 10
W#2 SinglesJackson Dyer vs Tim MacAleese6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Yancey Jones
published 4
3.79
Jackson Dyer
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.77
Jacob Dyer
published 4
3.62
Thomas Leftwich
published
3.49
Patrick Murtaugh
published
3.08
Joseph Jones
published
2.85
Erik Ringberg
published 3
2.64
Mark Scallon
published
Stan Craig
published
Travis Bohn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackson Dyer + Yancey Jones361064% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Yancey Jones
89W–39L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jackson Dyer
141W–63L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Jacob Dyer
12W–15L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Thomas Leftwich
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Patrick Murtaugh
22W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%54%46%
3.49
Joseph Jones
10W–4L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Erik Ringberg
14W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
2.85
Mark Scallon
1W–10L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
2.64
Stan Craig
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Travis Bohn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.